![]() |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
And Colonel.
Also, General. But General shouldn't be hard to distinguish because we can all count to four. (hopefully) Sergeant works for buck sergeants and (some) staff sergeants in the Army. For instance, I was never referred to as "Staff Sergeant" always sergeant or Mack. The Marines, as I understand it, get persnickety about terms of address for enlisted folks and prefer to use the whole title
__________________
I like to think, that before that Navy SEAL double tapped bin Laden in the head, he kicked him, so that we could truly say we put a boot in his ass. |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
__________________
"Me fail English? That's unpossible!" |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Seeing something Thejoker wrote on the wiki reminded me of this: Should we standardize how we do foreign titles? I've always preferred to have the page title be the US title, and then create redirects for the foreign/original title. That way, if you type in "Battleship Potemkin," it'll go straight to that page, rather than a search page. I see a lot of users use both, so it'd be Battleship Potemkin (Bronenosets Potyomkin). Any thoughts?
__________________
"Me fail English? That's unpossible!" |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I've added it to the style guide.
__________________
"Me fail English? That's unpossible!" |
![]() |
|
|