imfdb.org  

Go Back   imfdb.org > The Forum > imfdb

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 01-10-2013, 10:13 PM
commando552 commando552 is offline
IMFDB Admin
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: England
Posts: 547
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by funkychinaman View Post
Just for reference, can you link to a 2.39:1 screencap?
2.39:1 is the most common aspect ratio for modern cinema released films. For example, all the screenshots on the Expendables 2 page. An example of a page where the images are 16:9 using 600px thumbnails is Burn Notice Season 6 (along with most current television series like Hawaii Five-0, Nikita or Covert Affairs and movies that aren't 2.39:1).

Last edited by commando552; 01-10-2013 at 10:24 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 01-10-2013, 10:47 PM
funkychinaman's Avatar
funkychinaman funkychinaman is offline
IMFDB & Forum Admin
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Bucks County, PA
Posts: 2,622
Default

I just did the math. Most of the Blu-Ray caps I've taken are 2.4:1.
__________________
"Me fail English? That's unpossible!"
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 01-11-2013, 02:35 AM
funkychinaman's Avatar
funkychinaman funkychinaman is offline
IMFDB & Forum Admin
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Bucks County, PA
Posts: 2,622
Default

I changed over the 21 Jump Street page to the proposed standard. Thoughts?
__________________
"Me fail English? That's unpossible!"
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 01-13-2013, 05:30 AM
Jcordell Jcordell is offline
Formerly "Checkman"
IMFDB Admin
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Idaho
Posts: 1,034
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by funkychinaman View Post
I changed over the 21 Jump Street page to the proposed standard. Thoughts?
It looks pretty good. I went and finished the page for Rolling Thunder (only took me 27 months!) going with 600px for the screencaps and I like the look.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 01-16-2013, 05:20 PM
funkychinaman's Avatar
funkychinaman funkychinaman is offline
IMFDB & Forum Admin
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Bucks County, PA
Posts: 2,622
Default

I would like to standardize the western style for Asian names.

- If we're going to IMDB for media titles, then it makes sense to extend that to actor names as well, and IMDB goes western style.

- Some Asians have western names, so it'd be weird having two standards. (Jackie Chan, Jet Li, Jay Chou, etc)

- As the rules mention, we're an American site, where the American release date and American release title comes first, and all pages must be in English. Well, in the US, the surname goes on the end, with very few exceptions. (Chow Yun Fat and Yao Ming are the only two I can think of.) Everybody else, Byung-Hun Lee (look at the GI Joe: Retaliation poster), Ken Watanabe, Ichiro Suzuki, the Chinese lady in the neighboring cubicle, every Chinese person I ever grew up with in the US, uses the western style.

Are there any objections?
__________________
"Me fail English? That's unpossible!"
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 01-26-2013, 05:23 PM
funkychinaman's Avatar
funkychinaman funkychinaman is offline
IMFDB & Forum Admin
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Bucks County, PA
Posts: 2,622
Default

How should we do ranks? Another user brought this up the other day, and I noticed it more while going though the Green Berets page. For example, Jim Hutton is credited on IMDB as "Sgt. Peterson," yet in his photo he's a SP5. Muldoon and Doc McGee are also listed as just Sergeants, yet their stripes say otherwise. Should actual insignia override the IMDB credit?
__________________
"Me fail English? That's unpossible!"
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 01-26-2013, 07:26 PM
SPEMack618 SPEMack618 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Georgia
Posts: 742
Default

Well, Petersen begins the film as a Spec-5, but eventually gets promoted to SGT when the Duke wants him for his A-Team.

However, Doc and Muldoon are MSGTs and SFCs respectifuly, so they should be listed as such.

I think we should use service specific abbreviations for each rank as we can.
__________________
I like to think, that before that Navy SEAL double tapped bin Laden in the head, he kicked him, so that we could truly say we put a boot in his ass.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 02-11-2013, 01:07 AM
Ben41 Ben41 is offline
IMFDB Admin
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 109
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by commando552 View Post
2.39:1 is the most common aspect ratio for modern cinema released films. For example, all the screenshots on the Expendables 2 page. An example of a page where the images are 16:9 using 600px thumbnails is Burn Notice Season 6 (along with most current television series like Hawaii Five-0, Nikita or Covert Affairs and movies that aren't 2.39:1).
I agree that 2.39 to 1 widescreen films should only go up to 600px since this has been the standard widely used throughout the site. 500px was originally the norm, but it was logical to change this with HD sources more readily available.

I generally believe that films that are shot in the 16x9 or 1.85x1 format should be 600px if the screencaps are high quality enough (either HD or directly from a commercial DVD). Otherwise, 500px for these films.

As for older films in the 4x3 format, 400px to 500px depending on the quality.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 02-11-2013, 02:00 AM
funkychinaman's Avatar
funkychinaman funkychinaman is offline
IMFDB & Forum Admin
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Bucks County, PA
Posts: 2,622
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ben41 View Post
I agree that 2.39 to 1 widescreen films should only go up to 600px since this has been the standard widely used throughout the site. 500px was originally the norm, but it was logical to change this with HD sources more readily available.

I generally believe that films that are shot in the 16x9 or 1.85x1 format should be 600px if the screencaps are high quality enough (either HD or directly from a commercial DVD). Otherwise, 500px for these films.

As for older films in the 4x3 format, 400px to 500px depending on the quality.
I've changed the style guide back and changed the pages that were made in the meantime while we discuss this. For my two cents, I'm pro-700px for anamorphic widescreen, as A) most films today are filmed in HD, B) HD and BD caps are more and more prevalent, and C) widescreen monitors are also more and more prevalent. On the other hand, I agree that 700px caps for non-HD or BD caps don't look great.

(Speaking of, we need someone to get BD caps for Lawrence of Arabia.)
__________________
"Me fail English? That's unpossible!"
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 01:56 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.