![]() |
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Okay, I was put into a very bad mood yesterday when I bought Payback: The Directors Cut to screencap, checked the site page (which was crappy), screencapped it in full, and then come back on to find the entire page done by Charley Driver. I'm not usually so assinine on this sort of thing but I was already in kind of a bad mood as it was due to personal matters.
I've posted this topic to debate my re-doing the page. First off, this movie is GREAT to comment on when it comes to lack of realism (and I took several screencaps to show this), but CD's first language isn't English, so he missed most of these. Second, the caps look kind of low-res, like the cinematographer was on drugs. He also put most of the screencaps out of chronological order, which gives me a headache. And he mis-identified a few guns, including Porter's main gun (which is a Model 27, not a Model 29) I apoligize if I'm sounding petty, but let me show you some comparison pics I made. I'll let you guys decide if I have the right to re-do it (Charley Driver's pic on top, mine on bottom): ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() I had to crop mine to fit next to his and all of his were various sizes for some reason, but aside from some of my caps having some side cut off, none of his images are edited to make mine look better, I guarantee. So, do I have the right?
__________________
![]() |
|
|