imfdb.org  

Go Back   imfdb.org > The Forum > Off Topic

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 12-21-2009, 05:32 PM
AdAstra2009's Avatar
AdAstra2009 AdAstra2009 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Maryland
Posts: 1,067
Default

Personally I'm against women in combat for a variety of reasons. I'm not going into it because it can get political. I will put one point out though. I've read that Islamic fighters do not surrender when it is a women as oppose to a man because they consider it shameful to surrender to a women.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Spartan198 View Post
Israelis have recently started opening combat roles to women.
From what I've read the Israelis stopped using women in combat units because of the negative effect it had on male soldiers morale when women were wounded/killed.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 12-21-2009, 05:47 PM
Rockwolf66's Avatar
Rockwolf66 Rockwolf66 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Oregon
Posts: 813
Default

I can say as a fact that the British had women in undercover roles in Northern Ireland and those women had the same chance of combat as their male counterparts and as such recived the same level of training. The only real differance between the two was that the women tended not to have the leverage to fully control a G3KA4 and that they prefered the Walther PPK to the Browning High Power.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 12-21-2009, 07:18 PM
MT2008's Avatar
MT2008 MT2008 is offline
IMFDB & Forum Admin
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 2,619
Default

It really sounds to me like a case-by-case basis is what's necessary to determine it. I know plenty of women who would probably perform better in combat than I would. I don't let that bruise my ego; I think that if they can fulfill the demands of the job, they should be allowed to do it.

But statistically, we do have to face facts: In general, women tend to be less physically and mentally capable than men. So women will inevitably be under-represented in combat roles no matter what. If the forces of political correctness start demanding that we scale down the requirements so that women can meet them, then I would be strongly opposed.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Nyles View Post
I'm serving in combat with women right now, and frankly it's a non-issue. A soldier is a soldier, man or woman. There are no occupations left in the CF that are gender segregated.

As for the old argument about women getting raped if captured, well, I've got news for you. If you are a man and get captured in Afghanistan, chances are you're going to get raped. This is not bashing Islam (which I have no patience for), or gay panic, or demonizing the enemy, it is a simple fact of life. In fact over here, because of Pashtunwali, women stand LESS chance of getting raped than men.
Yeah, I've heard the same thing. The Pashtun are so afraid of women that they actually like little boys better. It's a running joke about them.

Quote:
Originally Posted by AdAstra2009 View Post
I've read that Islamic fighters do not surrender when it is a women as oppose to a man because they consider it shameful to surrender to a women.
Then how do you explain the Iraqi soldiers in the Gulf War surrendering to newscrews, many of which had female reporters?

Quote:
Originally Posted by k9870 View Post
Its more that if several soldiers are captured, a terrorist will threaten to kill or torture the women to make male prisoners talk, this is actually quite effective, as men crack to protect a woman way easier than to protect other men.
Yeah, but that's something you can train them to deal with because it's based mostly on culture. It doesn't strike me as a compelling enough reason.

As I've said, I think that even if SF were open to women, there would still be almost no women (if any) who qualified. So it strikes me as a moot point.

Last edited by MT2008; 12-21-2009 at 07:28 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 12-21-2009, 07:26 PM
Spartan198's Avatar
Spartan198 Spartan198 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: The scorched state of California
Posts: 2,305
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MT2008 View Post
Then how do you explain the Iraqi soldiers in the Gulf War surrendering to newscrews, many of which had female reporters?
How do you explain Saddam's Iraqi army being considered an army to begin with?
__________________
"Everything is impossible until somebody does it - Batman

RIP Kevin Conroy, the one true Batman

Last edited by Spartan198; 12-21-2009 at 07:29 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 12-21-2009, 07:31 PM
MT2008's Avatar
MT2008 MT2008 is offline
IMFDB & Forum Admin
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 2,619
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Spartan198 View Post
How do you explain Saddam's Iraqi army being considered an army to begin with?
Good point.

But seriously, they were mostly Muslims, I'm sure. Some of them probably had Islamist tendencies. And anyway, the jihadists are mostly cowards (aside from a select few Islamist groups who are decently tough).
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 12-21-2009, 11:13 PM
Excalibur's Avatar
Excalibur Excalibur is offline
IMFDB Admin
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: USA
Posts: 3,842
Send a message via AIM to Excalibur Send a message via MSN to Excalibur Send a message via Yahoo to Excalibur
Default

During WWII, The Russians employed women in their frontline military. Israel also has women in active combat duty.
__________________

"There's a fine line between not listening and not caring...I like to think I walk that line everyday of my life."

Blessed be the LORD, my rock, Who trains my hands for war, And my fingers for battle
Psalm 144:1

“It is always wrong to use force, unless it is more wrong not to.”
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 12-22-2009, 12:01 AM
MT2008's Avatar
MT2008 MT2008 is offline
IMFDB & Forum Admin
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 2,619
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Excalibur View Post
During WWII, The Russians employed women in their frontline military. Israel also has women in active combat duty.
Well, yes, but that was because (1.) Stalin was spending men's lives quite rapidly against the Germans, and (2.) they were egalitarian Commies trying to impose social engineering upon the population.

I think the most relevant factor in the debate is whether or not women are up to the task. Individual women might be, but that's probably going to be rare.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 12-22-2009, 02:26 AM
Spartan198's Avatar
Spartan198 Spartan198 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: The scorched state of California
Posts: 2,305
Default

Not to mention they had the Germans literally beating down their front door, something the US hasn't experienced since the 1800s and likely never will again.
__________________
"Everything is impossible until somebody does it - Batman

RIP Kevin Conroy, the one true Batman
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 12-22-2009, 05:28 PM
AdAstra2009's Avatar
AdAstra2009 AdAstra2009 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Maryland
Posts: 1,067
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MT2008 View Post
Then how do you explain the Iraqi soldiers in the Gulf War surrendering to newscrews, many of which had female reporters?
Poor morale/no will to fight

And by Islamists, I am referring to Taliban fighters/Insurgents
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 12-22-2009, 05:37 PM
Nyles Nyles is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 921
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MT2008 View Post
Yeah, I've heard the same thing. The Pashtun are so afraid of women that they actually like little boys better. It's a running joke about them.
It's not so much that, but as a Pashtun dishonoring a woman is pretty much the worst thing you can do. It's like child rape to us (which, to them, while frowned upon, not as big a deal).

The thing about women in the military is that once you get over it, the whole thing seems kind of silly. There will never be many women in the infantry, but those that are make damned good soldiers. I don't want to sound like a holier than thou Canadian, but one thing I've noticed about working with US troops is they have a huge hang-up about it.

My friend Anna, who before transferring to our current trade was an infanteer, went on an exercise in the states where she was one of two females, both Canadians obviously. They gave them separate tents, drove them out of the field every night to shower, their officers gave big speeches about leaving them alone, etc, and alot of them couldn't wrap their heads around the idea of a female combat soldier. Well, of course female soldiers aren't going to work if you treat them like that.

No female soldier I've worked with wants special treatment, those that do are shitpumps, but they're no different from any male shitpump I've ever worked with (and there seems to be more of those). Treat them like any other soldier, that's what they'll be. In the CF, in garrison female soldiers won't share a room with males, and there are separate bathroom facilities. That's all.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 06:21 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.