![]() |
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
So let's stop talking about it. If the liberals ever build a time machine, they could go back and assassinate John Browning for this very reason...
__________________
|
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
Well, the paradox would definately hurt us gun lovers if John Browning's inovation never existed.
And the series ended with such a contradiction. Doc was always complaining about creating paradoxes, yet he decided to live in 1885 in the end. Like doing so wouldn't effect the future?
__________________
|
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
I never thought he had that good a grasp of reality in the first place.
__________________
"Everything is impossible until somebody does it - Batman RIP Kevin Conroy, the one true Batman |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
If they killed John Browning we'd all be carrying SAA Colts, Mauser C96 Broomhandles, Webleys, Lugers and the Smith & Wesson large frame 44.
|
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
Not just Webley revolvers, but autos. Last time I was at home I took apart my Webley & Scott 1910 and decided one of the things I liked about it is how mechanically, it owes absolutely nothing to John Moses Browning (other than being chambered in .38ACP). It works fine, but the methods used to solve all the problems were definately NOT borrowed from Browning. The mainspring is a V shaped spring under the grip panel, the barrel assembly slides up and forward with the slide locked all the way back, even the mag release is a push button on the bottom the grip - completely un-Browning.
|
![]() |
|
|