![]() |
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
Finger grooves, I'm kinda divided. I like how the straight frontstrap looks much better, but the grooves work fine for me, so I've never taken them off the Glocks I own that have them. Quote:
__________________
Cry "Havoc," and let slip the hogs of war. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Kinda surprising, but the Glock 17L Gen 5 MOS has been announced.
https://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/...-17l-gen5-mos/
__________________
"You say I'm dirty minded... but how did you understand what I meant?" Last edited by Ultimate94ninja; 05-20-2024 at 05:09 PM. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
Last edited by Jcordell; 05-21-2024 at 03:18 AM. |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
Quote:
I definitely don't understand the point of offering the G17L in a Gen5 MOS configuration, though. If you're buying a pistol to put an optic on it - which is the main reason anyone would buy the MOS version - then why bother purchasing a gun with such a long iron sight radius? (Side note: I've always thought that the G17L from the movie "Ronin" was an impractical setup in reality for this exact reason.)
__________________
Cry "Havoc," and let slip the hogs of war. Last edited by MT2008; 05-22-2024 at 03:05 PM. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I agree. I purchased a G34 a few months ago for the longer sight radius.I don't think I'm going to put optics on it either.
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Not sure if anyone's heard yet, but the G17L Gen 5 is apparently very unreliable. At least two firearms YouTube channels that I watch have tested it now, and encountered serious jamming issues even with decently-powered loads. Apparently, the slide just isn't light enough to handle many loads, possibly because Glock didn't put the lightning cut found on earlier G17L generations. I suspect that the recoil spring is also a bit too stiff, and I wouldn't be surprised if Glock needed to play around a bit more with the feed ramps and barrel lock-up, too.
I see a lot of people selling Gen 3 G17L slide/barrel assemblies on eBay, and I've been tempted to buy one just to retrofit to my Gen 3 G34 frame. The main reason I haven't is that the sellers always want ridiculous prices for them (often the cost of an entire gun), and they're all post-2010 assemblies, which I can tell by the S/Ns. I won't buy Gen 3s made after 2010 because those don't have the Tennifer treatment, unlike all of the Gen 3s that I own now, and IMHO, that's still the most durable and aesthetically pleasing finish that Glock has ever offered.
__________________
Cry "Havoc," and let slip the hogs of war. Last edited by MT2008; 06-24-2024 at 12:10 AM. |
![]() |
|
|