![]() |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
I just had a random though that has never occurred to me before, does anyone know if something like this would still count as a stock if it couldn't be extended and hence actually used? This isn't a great example as you could argue that you could shoulder it even in the retracted position, but could you legally have a stock fitted to a MAC-10 or Uzi "pistol" as long as it was welded in place? Another drop in stock that would be good to see somebody make would be the Morita. It would have a legal barrel, we know it would work as a drop in kit as that is what it was originally built from, and it already has a carbine variant if you wanted to get rid of the shotgun to make it simpler/more legal. |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
Compare using the ejection port: ![]() ![]() Not that getting hold of a longer barrel should be an issue, since the government seems to be more concerned with SBRs and the like.
__________________
"Everything is impossible until somebody does it - Batman RIP Kevin Conroy, the one true Batman |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
If you really wanted a firing replica of a pulse rifle/make such a thing available for whoever wants one, I reckon the best bet would be a "send in your Tommy Gun, pay a fee, do whatever you need for the fees to the gov't, and I'll make it look like a pulse rifle" kind of deal
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
__________________
![]() "There's a fine line between not listening and not caring...I like to think I walk that line everyday of my life." Blessed be the LORD, my rock, Who trains my hands for war, And my fingers for battle Psalm 144:1 “It is always wrong to use force, unless it is more wrong not to.” |
![]() |
|
|