imfdb.org  

Go Back   imfdb.org > The Forum > Just Guns

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 03-13-2013, 08:32 PM
SPEMack618 SPEMack618 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Georgia
Posts: 742
Default

Neat! Love the sites on the Carcanco.
__________________
I like to think, that before that Navy SEAL double tapped bin Laden in the head, he kicked him, so that we could truly say we put a boot in his ass.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 03-13-2013, 08:41 PM
Nyles Nyles is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 921
Default

Yeah, they're quite neat. A spring loaded button the left pushes the leaf aside so you can move it, when released it locks it into grooves on the base corresponding to your various ranges. There's even a cutout on the handguard so you can flip it all the way down and expose a fixed battle sight on the base, which is an unusualy large notch - put the blade at the top of the notch and it's good for 200M, at the bottom 100M. The later M38 series operated with just the fixed sight, which I think is plenty good enough for most combat ranges!
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 03-13-2013, 08:51 PM
SPEMack618 SPEMack618 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Georgia
Posts: 742
Default

Cool. That system seems very similar to the sights on the, and I'm gonna botch this, the Vitterelli rifles.
__________________
I like to think, that before that Navy SEAL double tapped bin Laden in the head, he kicked him, so that we could truly say we put a boot in his ass.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 03-13-2013, 09:15 PM
Nyles Nyles is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 921
Default

That's absolutely where it came from. The Swiss came out with the Vetterli with a tube magazine in 1869, and then Italians adopted them in a single-shot version in 1870 (followed up by the Vetterli-Vitali with box magazine in 1887). When the Italians came out with the Carcano they just used the same system of sights their soldiers were familiar with. Interestingly, due to rifle shortages, in 1915 the Italians actually reissued Vetterlis converted to 6.5mm with a Carcano-type magazine to rear-echelon troops. I'm actually planning on picking one up soon-ish, though I have other priorities at the moment since they're not actually safe to shoot!
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 03-13-2013, 09:20 PM
SPEMack618 SPEMack618 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Georgia
Posts: 742
Default

Hey!

That explains what Great-Grandpa was doing with a convertered Vetterli-Vitali. I knew the gun was a war bring back but couldn't figure out why it wasn't in 10mm Rimmed or whatever the heck it was originally chambered in.

Neat gun, cleaning rod included.
__________________
I like to think, that before that Navy SEAL double tapped bin Laden in the head, he kicked him, so that we could truly say we put a boot in his ass.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 04-19-2013, 01:19 AM
Nyles Nyles is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 921
Default

Got one great acquisition this month - an FN 1924 Mauser made on contract for the Kingdom of Serbs, Croats and Slovenes, which became Yugoslavia in 1928. Yugoslavian Mausers are pretty common in North America, but only the post-war Communist era models - the M48 and M24/47, which was a rebuild of an FN M1924 or Kragujevac M24 (which was the same rifle actually made IN Yugoslavia) with a new barrel with hooded front sight. Because almost all the M1924 or M24s were rebuilt to the M24/47 standard, you rarely find original pre-communist Yugo Mausers.

This one is all original, with a great monarchist crest and FN factory adress, along with the CXC stamp for Serb, Croats and Slovens and clear King Alexander I cartouche. It's all matching, and came with a postwar-era Yugo sling. As far as history goes, obviously it was used by the Yugoslav Royal Army up until the German invasion in 1941, but Yugoslavia went to utter shit in the 40s (not unlike Yugoslavia in the 90s), at which point it would have ended up in the hands of Communist Partisans, Serb Royalist partisans (Chetniks - some of whom then allied with the Germans to fight the Communists), Serb collaborationist government, Croatian Fascist militia (Ustasha) or regulars (Croatian Home Guard), pretty much all of whom fought everybody else at one point or another. I don't know how it managed to escape the Communist-era reworks, but it's a great uncommon WW2 rifle.



Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 04-19-2013, 01:25 AM
Nyles Nyles is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 921
Default

I also picked up a WW2 M1 bayonet for my Garand, made by American Fork & Hoe sometime between 1942-1945. Still has the original WW2 resin-impregnated canvas scabbard.



Finally, although this is in no way military and probably dates to postwar, I picked up a uniquely Canadian gun, a Cooey Model 60 .22 repeater. Cooey made about 2 million inexpensive .22s and shotguns between 1919 and 1961, when they were bought by Winchester, none of which were exported. I would say most Canadians alive today between age 80 and 30 probably learned to shoot with a Cooey .22, and in my experience the Model 60 is the most common. They actually tend to shoot pretty accurately due to the long, heavy barrel, and the fact that though they were simple, they were well made. I bought this mainly because I wanted to have a .22 around for new shooters, it's a great piece of Canadiana, and at $50 it was cheaper than the bayonet.

Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 12:26 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.