|
|
|
|
#1
01-23-2013, 05:26 PM
|
||||
|
||||
I don't know if they can justify that much money for a new pistol. I think almost everyone who actually uses pistols (aviators, SOCOM) already got them. Who does that leave, MPs? Tankers?
I don't know if they can justify the costs of replacing the M4 either. Maybe just new uppers?
__________________
"Me fail English? That's unpossible!" 
|
|
#2
01-23-2013, 05:54 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
I think all combat troops need a pistol. Not just sf. Cue the "id rather have another mag" crowd but a pistol is mighty handy for transitions. theres a reason every carbine course out there teaches handgun transition.
__________________
"I don't need luck, I have ammo!" Grunt, Mass effect 3
|
|
#3
01-23-2013, 06:27 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
And this goes back to costs. It would costs too much to give every man a sidearm. Some do get them depending on their jobs.
__________________
 "There's a fine line between not listening and not caring...I like to think I walk that line everyday of my life." Blessed be the LORD, my rock, Who trains my hands for war, And my fingers for battle Psalm 144:1 “It is always wrong to use force, unless it is more wrong not to.”
|
|
#4
01-23-2013, 06:39 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
handguns for combat troops is not that expensive in the big picture, look at the cost of a icbm. The glorious leader has had 1.4 billion spent on his vacations.
__________________
"I don't need luck, I have ammo!" Grunt, Mass effect 3
|
|
#5
01-23-2013, 09:31 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
As in more #$%@!* money to spend on ammo to train with.
__________________
I like to think, that before that Navy SEAL double tapped bin Laden in the head, he kicked him, so that we could truly say we put a boot in his ass.
|
 |
|
|
Hybrid Mode
