![]() |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
I agree, but it's important that this information be put out there. Personally I hope that NPR and the other anti-gun folks keep at it. Keep beating that drum because they're getting people (on our side of this issue) angry and fired up.
|
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
I really need an image of an AC566 with a fixed stock plus a five round magazine and an AR15 with a grippod and as many other "evil" features i can cram onto it as i have an Idea for a bit of counter propaganda.
|
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
There you go.
|
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
You mean show how the Anti gun people can't tell a Machinegun that falls under legal restrictions dateing back to 1934 and a rifle that is very popular for hunting, target shooting and competition?
Last edited by Rockwolf66; 12-28-2012 at 06:45 AM. Reason: added Image |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
I thought passing ex post facto laws was forbidden under the US constitution, meaning that the last part about people who currently legally own "assault weapons" having the register them would be quite clearly unconstitutional would it not?
|
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
I would think so, but they did that very thing to owners of full automatic weapons when they passed the 1934 National Firearms Act. As I understand it.
|
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
|
So this bill doesn't ban the possession of the weapons it's trying to ban...which won't change a damn thing
__________________
![]() "There's a fine line between not listening and not caring...I like to think I walk that line everyday of my life." Blessed be the LORD, my rock, Who trains my hands for war, And my fingers for battle Psalm 144:1 “It is always wrong to use force, unless it is more wrong not to.” |
![]() |
|
|