New Video Games/ Movies

[Excalibur]

Originally Posted by Spartan198

What trailer are you guys talking about? I checked YouTube which was, as usual, full of fan-made "official" movie trailers, but none of the ones for World War Z looked even remotely legit.

This

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Md6Dvxdr0AQ

[funkychinaman]

You knew they couldn't just walk away from that big pile of money, but stilll...

http://insidemovies.ew.com/2012/11/0...mark-wahlberg/

[Clutch]

Originally Posted by funkychinaman

You knew they couldn't just walk away from that big pile of money, but stilll...

http://insidemovies.ew.com/2012/11/0...mark-wahlberg/

They need a new definition of "sleek".

Also, they need to be careful with Walhberg. If anything turns out to be off about this movie - which, given it's a Michael Bay production, is a very real possibility - Mark will sleepwalk through it to get to the check.

[funkychinaman]

If you're going to ruin your career for a video game, I'd hope it was for a better video game.

http://security.blogs.cnn.com/2012/1...eal/?hpt=hp_t3

[k9870]

seems world war z has fast zombies and no headshots only crap. may be cool

[SPEMack618]

And see that is what made the Z War good, the zombies were slow, but they numbered in the billions and you had to take them down with a headshot.

And it's gone. Well damn.

[Excalibur]

The tension is gone too. All we got is an action movie.

The zombies in this trailer tells they are smarter and move like wild animals than the living undead. Even since the remake Dawn of the Dead and 28 days later, zombies that run are over taking the main stream and it's stupid,

Max Brooks went through great details in his books about what the zombies are like

[Spartan198]

Originally Posted by funkychinaman

If you're going to ruin your career for a video game, I'd hope it was for a better video game.

http://security.blogs.cnn.com/2012/1...eal/?hpt=hp_t3

Yet it's okay that the Pentagon ordered one SEAL to reveal similarly-secret information for Zero Dark Thirty, apparently.

And Warfighter was a damn fine game, IMO.

[Excalibur]

Originally Posted by Spartan198

Yet it's okay that the Pentagon ordered one SEAL to reveal similarly-secret information for Zero Dark Thirty, apparently.

And Warfighter was a damn fine game, IMO.

It was an ok game. Intense and a little better than BF3 when it comes to single player experience EXCEPT for the breaching moments. NONE of your team mates assist you in taking out the room. If there are 5 guys in the room, it is your job to take them all out. Bullshit and annoying

[Clutch]

Originally Posted by Spartan198

Yet it's okay that the Pentagon ordered one SEAL to reveal similarly-secret information for Zero Dark Thirty, apparently.

And Warfighter was a damn fine game, IMO.

I crossed Warfighter off of my list after I played the beta. I knew that they were going to go the Call of Duty route and focus on multiplayer...but Jesus, I wasn't expecting a full-bore screw-up like that. Nothing felt like it was weighted properly, it took entirely too many rounds to down one person, you didn't get enough ammo to actually do anything, and the menus were probably the most confusing I've ever used in a game. So now I'm waiting for a major price cut to even pick up the game for it's single player, and wondering if I should even do that, given everything I've heard about that aspect.

On a related note, I'm starting to formulate a theory about EA games. The quality of their games is directly inverse to the amount of advertising they put into it. The less I hear about one of their games, the better it actually is. If they start launching a full-on advertising blitz, it's probably gonna suck. Also, I'm real wary of ANY game that has Frostbite 2 as a selling point.