![]() |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Unless the wiki is going to lump the machine pistol and SMG categories together, I believe a definition like mine would do well to settle the grey areas between the two. And the "machine gun" definition is a bit outdated by those unfamiliar with firearms. It used to mean any firearm that was capable of fully-automatic fire or was select-fire. Now that term should stick with the infantry support weapon class or a vehicle-mounted fully-automatic firing weapon.
|
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
|
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
If there are no more forthcoming objections, I believe I'll be posting this guide to the SMG and Machine Pistol talk pages soon. |
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Personally I think this guide is kind of arbitrary imho |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
Pardon me, where was I being arbitrary? I thought I clearly explained my reasoning.
|
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
Your creating a definition for a submachine gun that goes further then the dictionary meaning, or then what most people would consider a smg. That is arbitrary.
|
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
I based it on the fact that the archetypal machine pistol is a handgun converted for select-fire and/or fully-automatic fire capability. That is what separates a machine pistol from other types of handguns--the ergonomics could be exactly the same (i.e., such as when you compare a Glock 18 to a Glock 17) as a similar semiautomatic-only handgun, but select-fire and/or fully-automatic fire capability would be what separate the two.
|
![]() |
| Tags |
| general information, new pages |
|
|