Combined force in Río de Janeiro

[k9870]

In brazil cops are killed on a regular basis and there crime situation IS A WAR. Its different than america. And burt, seriously, what do you say we do, legalize all drugs and dish out welfare checks like halloween candy?

[BurtReynoldsMoustache]

Originally Posted by k9870

In brazil cops are killed on a regular basis and there crime situation IS A WAR. Its different than america. And burt, seriously, what do you say we do, legalize all drugs and dish out welfare checks like halloween candy?

Drugs, yes. Welfare checks, no.

[k9870]

You do know those gangs dont just traffic drugs, theyve got gun running, human trafficking, chop shops and stealing valuables, right? There a threat, a bigass threat, to everyone and seeing them wiped out is good.

[BurtReynoldsMoustache]

Originally Posted by k9870

You do know those gangs dont just traffic drugs, theyve got gun running, human trafficking, chop shops and stealing valuables, right? There a threat, a bigass threat, to everyone and seeing them wiped out is good.

You're missing the point that running into a shantytown guns blazing isn't really a solution to any of those problems. Legalize drugs (and guns) and you've delivered a tremendous blow to the gangs' abilities to organize and resist. Yes they'll still be up to no good with human trafficking and property theft, but the real money is in drugs. You can't finance an army with the profits from a chop shop, and it's alot easier to maintain the moral high ground (and therefore garner public support) when you're up against people who prostitute children as opposed to people who sell some powders to consenting adults.

[k9870]

There not strolling around guns blazing, there occupying and setting up security, and only shooting in defense. You make it seem like there hosing anybody in the street.

And legalizing RPGs and belt fed MGs will not stop gang violence.....and cars are legal, the gangs still steal them. As to human trafficking, im waiting for your response.

[BurtReynoldsMoustache]

Originally Posted by k9870

There not strolling around guns blazing, there occupying and setting up security, and only shooting in defense. You make it seem like there hosing anybody in the street.

And legalizing RPGs and belt fed MGs will not stop gang violence.....and cars are legal, the gangs still steal them. As to human trafficking, im waiting for your response.

Stealing a car isn't a crime of possession. It's not illegal to have a car, just to have somebody else's car without their permission. Whereas drugs are illegal no matter how you obtained them. So you're argument that "cars are legal and people still steal them" doesn't really make sense.

Anyway, if you take away the massive profits from drugs, you're left with a whole host of other crimes. Though none of them are able to maintain the level of presence and influence that criminal organizations currently have. Nobody ever threatened national security with an auto theft ring, there just isn't enough money in it.

And human trafficking? Take all the money spent on the drug war and spend it on fighting that instead. You're still not going to need an entire battalion of mechanized infantry to do it.

[MT2008]

Originally Posted by BurtReynoldsMoustache

You're missing the point that running into a shantytown guns blazing isn't really a solution to any of those problems.

They're not going in guns blazing exactly (though obviously they are conducting armed raids). They are occupying the favelas. There is a difference.

Originally Posted by BurtReynoldsMoustache

Legalize drugs (and guns) and you've delivered a tremendous blow to the gangs' abilities to organize and resist. Yes they'll still be up to no good with human trafficking and property theft, but the real money is in drugs. You can't finance an army with the profits from a chop shop, and it's alot easier to maintain the moral high ground (and therefore garner public support) when you're up against people who prostitute children as opposed to people who sell some powders to consenting adults.

You seem to have trouble separating your ideals from what is practical. The Brazilians don't have any control over American drug laws.

Also, while I am not opposed to Brazil reducing its gun laws (which are pretty ridiculous), I sure hope you're not naive enough to believe that armed citizens are going to be a match for drug gangs with automatic weapons and RPGs? Not to mention that there's a thin line between civilian and drug dealer in places like this. I am not sure one could expect much "resistance" to the gangs even if guns were easier to get.

[Excalibur]

I thought in Brazil it is legal to get guns, just getting permits and licenses.

And as I said before, legalizing drugs won't solve the crime problem. Why do you think in the US, people are saying that is a stupid idea. Sure taxing it would raise a lot of money and would surely make it hard for the organized crime to lose their hold on it, but saying you can go into a store and buy cocaine and meth because it's legal now is a very bad idea.

Originally Posted by BurtReynoldsMoustache

There are lots of drugs (mostly psychedelics) that are neither addictive nor particularly lethal. For example MDMA (ecstasy) killed 63 Americans in the year 2000. That same year saw 85,000 Americans killed by alcohol and 435,000 Americans killed by tobacco.

Have you seen what Coke can do you you on the first try? Meth? LSD? X? I've seen people die from THAT SHIT! I knew people! I have friends in law enforcement and their lives destroyed by drug corruption! Don't tell me it is not addictive nor NOT particularly lethal! I don't care if it'll send you off to your "happy place" and then bring you back. Why don't you take a shot of heroin or some coke up your nose and tell ME how you fucking feel!

I don't want any drugs no addictive or otherwise to be legal. It's already illegal to smoke in bars and a lot of restaurants and college campus. They can't can't get rid of something that is already so wide spread and legal for decades.

[BurtReynoldsMoustache]

Originally Posted by Excalibur

And as I said before, legalizing drugs won't solve the crime problem. Why do you think in the US, people are saying that is a stupid idea.

Because they've been sold on the propaganda and people in general are afraid of changing the status quo. Most people (LE personnel excluded) who campaign and crusade against drugs are very ignorant of the realities of drug using behavior, preferring to view it as a singular monolith of depravity out to snatch their children.

Originally Posted by Excalibur

Sure taxing it would raise a lot of money and would surely make it hard for the organized crime to lose their hold on it, but saying you can go into a store and buy cocaine and meth because it's legal now is a very bad idea.

If people want to wreck their lives, I'd rather the profits go to publicly held corporations or legitimately run private companies instead of criminal organizations that will use the money to corrupt cops, judges, and legislators, kill people, blow up cars, and enable violently sociopathic behavior amongst their associates.

Originally Posted by Excalibur

Have you seen what Coke can do you you on the first try? Meth? LSD? X? I've seen people die from THAT SHIT!

Yes, people die from alot of things. It's part of living in a free society. We are all personally responsible for ourselves. People wreck their lives in many different ways; gambling, prostitutes, bad investments, not buying proper insurance. You can die the first time you go skydiving. You can die walking down the street. Life is dangerous.

Originally Posted by Excalibur

I knew people! I have friends in law enforcement and their lives destroyed by drug corruption!

Sounds like they fucked up then. It happens. And when you say "drug corruption" do you mean they got involved with criminals and it didn't work out for them? If that's the case then I have no sympathy, corrupt cops are scum and deserve whatever they get coming to them, even more so than regular criminals.

Originally Posted by Excalibur

Don't tell me it is not addictive nor NOT particularly lethal!

Not all drugs are the same.

Originally Posted by Excalibur

I don't care if it'll send you off to your "happy place" and then bring you back. Why don't you take a shot of heroin or some coke up your nose and tell ME how you fucking feel!

Made my nose feel a bit tingly, felt a little lifted for a few minutes, then everyone around me became very annoying and I had a panic attack. Can't say I enjoyed it, but to each his own. That was 4 years ago, I haven't touched it since. Why am I not breaking into peoples houses or performing sexual favors? Oh right, I have the ability to make informed decisions about my own life and my own actions and I value my health and sanity over fleeting moments of chemical euphoria. If other people don't, that is not my problem.

Originally Posted by Excalibur

I don't want any drugs no addictive or otherwise to be legal.

If you really believe that, then you've got a lot of molecules to outlaw, including almost every drug that is already a controlled substance, because unless it's on Schedule I, it's still legal under certain circumstances. Do you want to ban Vicodin and Oxycontin? What about Fentanyl? Fentanyl is far more dangerous than Heroin, being lethal in microgram amounts, but for patients in advanced stages of cancer it's manna from Heaven. Benzodiazepines like Xanax, Valium, and Ativan are very addictive, but absolutely necessary for people with severe anxiety and insomnia.

Do you want to ban dextromethorphan? (Robitussin) Do you want to ban dimenhydrinate? (Dramamine) What about nutmeg, should we ban nutmeg? Dust Off? Nitrous oxide? Gasoline?

Originally Posted by Excalibur

It's already illegal to smoke in bars and a lot of restaurants and college campus. They can't can't get rid of something that is already so wide spread and legal for decades.

How can you actually believe this statement and the previous statement? That's quite a blatant case of cognitive dissonance. MDMA is not allowed even though it is neither addictive nor very lethal (a majority of deaths are caused by overexertion or toxic impurities, not an overdose of the MDMA molecule) but it's perfectly acceptable for Joe Citizen to drink himself into a coma because, why the hell not, everybody's doing it?

The argument that you can't ban tobacco and alcohol because "They can't can't get rid of something that is already so wide spread and legal for decades." doesn't hold up in against history. Drugs being illegal is a very recent phenomenon. The use of opium, coca, cannabis, ephedra, psylocibin, and DMT go back just as far as alcohol, millenia into prehistory. And still today the use of drugs is far more widespread and popular than anyone really wants to admit. It was never not widespread. Of all the factors that lead to decreased drug use in populations, legislation and enforcement is the least relevant.

[Excalibur]

Drugs? Maybe Pot, but none of the other illegal drug serve a purpose but to addict people and kill them.