imfdb.org  

Go Back   imfdb.org > The Forum > Just Guns

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 10-29-2010, 03:22 PM
BurtReynoldsMoustache BurtReynoldsMoustache is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 929
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Spades of Columbia View Post
Why is Mannlicher wrong?
Because Mannlicher had nothing to do with it, they are just similar. It'd be like calling an AK-47 a Garand-Kalashnikov.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 10-29-2010, 09:14 PM
Spades of Columbia Spades of Columbia is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Northwest Montana
Posts: 264
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by BurtReynoldsMoustache View Post
Because Mannlicher had nothing to do with it, they are just similar. It'd be like calling an AK-47 a Garand-Kalashnikov.
Well...no...its not like calling a ak-47 a Garand-Kalashnikov because no one has ever used that term...but if you research "mannlicher-carcano" you get a crap load of information on the 6.5x52mmR...and even Parravicino would be concidered wrong by your logic because the official title in Italian is Modello 1891 or even M91.

Last edited by Spades of Columbia; 10-29-2010 at 10:16 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 10-30-2010, 02:02 AM
Nyles Nyles is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 921
Default

A better comparison might be calling an SKS a Simonov-Kalashnikov because they look similar, but are actually not related. The Carcano doesn't use a Mannlicher or Mauser bolt, or a Mannlicher magazine, as is sometimes stated. The bolt is original and the magazine is adapted from the German Reichsgewehr 88.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 11-01-2010, 01:49 AM
k9870's Avatar
k9870 k9870 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Maine
Posts: 4,255
Default

What was the first centerfire cartridge? I want to know, cant find a solid answer anywhere. Im thinking Nyles may have an idea since hes good with older firearms.
__________________
"I don't need luck, I have ammo!"

Grunt, Mass effect 3
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 11-01-2010, 01:52 AM
Excalibur's Avatar
Excalibur Excalibur is offline
IMFDB Admin
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: USA
Posts: 3,842
Send a message via AIM to Excalibur Send a message via MSN to Excalibur Send a message via Yahoo to Excalibur
Default

The .45-70?
__________________

"There's a fine line between not listening and not caring...I like to think I walk that line everyday of my life."

Blessed be the LORD, my rock, Who trains my hands for war, And my fingers for battle
Psalm 144:1

“It is always wrong to use force, unless it is more wrong not to.”
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 11-01-2010, 01:59 AM
k9870's Avatar
k9870 k9870 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Maine
Posts: 4,255
Default

no, i think that was one of the first adopted by a military power though.
__________________
"I don't need luck, I have ammo!"

Grunt, Mass effect 3
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 11-01-2010, 02:42 PM
Nyles Nyles is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 921
Default

Would have been .577 Snider, .450 Adams or .50-70 Government, all in 1866. The .45-70 actually originally used the Benet internal primer system, where the primer was inside the case and the firing pin punched through the base to set it off, they didn't change to the standard Boxer primer until 1882.

The .52 Maynard Cabine, introduced in 1860 and used in the US Civil War, was almost a centerfire, but it was externally primed. An external tape primer sent a flame through a pinhole in the base of the cartridge.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 01:22 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.