![]() |
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
You know what? I'm sort of pissed that the 4506 isn't in movies very often. And when it is, it's just about always used by a random thug (except for in Street Kings and Training Day) Last edited by S&Wshooter; 06-14-2010 at 01:42 AM. |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
you know what they say about guys with big hands right?
.....big guns fit perfectly in them!
__________________
Every man's life ends the same way, it's only the details of how he lived that distinguish one from another.. |
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
Also, we can crush other people's hands if we aren't careful when we give handshakes
Last edited by S&Wshooter; 06-14-2010 at 03:27 PM. |
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Since it's discontinued you won't see much of it. The only time you'll see the 4506 is in an LAPD film, you also get to see your favorite gun the Beretta. |
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
That makes me want to do this: RAAAAGE!
|
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
I think that if nothing else, the 4506 is likely to be rare because armorers tend to use 9mm pistols so often. As Steve has explained elsewhere, the Beretta's popularity is because (1.) it's a 9mm, and (2.) it's one of the most reliable pistols with blank rounds. |
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
|
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
|
Looked nice, 20 years ago. Now it looks outdated. It still gets used mostly for the two reasons I mentioned.
|
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
|
It's still a nice looking gun. I probably would buy one if it weren't for the whole "too fragile for the Navy SEALs" and "everyone I know who owns/had to carry one hates it"
|
|
#10
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Quote:
Also, I don't know what you're on about with Berettas being "fragile". They're not as durable as Glocks, but they're about as rugged as any all-metal handgun should be. The SEALs ditched the Beretta because its slide retention device was not strong enough to handle higher-pressure ammo than recommended. I don't have a problem with them using SIGs, but I also don't think the Beretta sucks just because it didn't meet a requirement specific to them. After all, what they need isn't necessarily what everyone else needs. (and besides, the 92FS, which replaced the original 92F that the SEALs rejected, has a fixed slide retention device.) If the Beretta really sucks so much, I doubt it would have passed the XM9 trial (and I should point that one of its competitors was S&W's modified 459). Last edited by MT2008; 06-19-2010 at 02:55 PM. |
![]() |
|
|