Good and Bad business decisions by gun companies:

[S&Wshooter]

The performance center 686? Yeah, it's pretty ugly. It's like tearing up a brand new Shelby Cobra and putting spinners, a spoiler and hydraulics into it

[S&Wshooter]

Good: Browning; for every single thing they have ever done
Good: FN, same as Browning
Good: S&W, for not taking advantage of their customers by not making everything way more expensive than it should be
Good: Colt, for all of their revolvers
Bad: Colt, for discontinuing the Python

[k9870]

Good: Browning; for every single thing they have ever done
Good: FN, same as Browning

Browning is part of FN, Id just say FN as a whole is a excellent company. Fn is the only company I know who puts 3 mags in with a new gun.

[S&Wshooter]

"Because FN-Browning loves you, and you're awesome"

[Nyles]

How about Remington putting cheap barrels on the Etronix rifles when the advantages of electronic priming apply mainly to match shooters?

Or Winchester going to push feed on the post-64 Model 70s?

[k9870]

Ive heard the push feed rifles were actually more accurate. FN fixed it though, apparently the new controlled feed fn model 70s are better than all previous winchester model 70s.

[k9870]

BTW, earlier I got a new Luger. I hate the thing. I can't find a .45 round it will feed consistently. The grip was also old so i threw them out and added some hogues. Theres also a tacky looking eagle on the reciever i had to grind off.

[k9870]

Okay, Bad by FN:

Love FN, but they neutered the civilan fs2000. The internals are plastic. Ive seen airsoft guns that look more robust. Not acceptable in a 2000 dollar gun.