![]() |
#21
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
You could do that and probably not notice any difference whatsoever in the capabilities of our military!
|
#22
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
The US Army did use a .38 at one point, but then they fought in the Spanish American war and realized the .38 suck ass. Quote:
I agree with that for the most part, which is why training is important. That's why the Marines are some of our best shooters. If you want to truly test a piece of equipment, give it to the Marines. They'll find a way to break it...on purpose.
__________________
![]() "There's a fine line between not listening and not caring...I like to think I walk that line everyday of my life." Blessed be the LORD, my rock, Who trains my hands for war, And my fingers for battle Psalm 144:1 “It is always wrong to use force, unless it is more wrong not to.” Last edited by Excalibur; 01-25-2017 at 02:44 PM. |
#23
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
The .38 the military adopted as it's main pistol caliber was the .38 Long Colt, which was black powder and due to the design of the bullet tended to exit the barrel undersized
.38 Special has a pretty long history in the US military, with various revolvers chambered in it being substitute standards (off the top of my head, the US military has issued S&W .38 Hand Ejector, the S&W Victory, the S&W Model 10, Colt Commando snubs, Colt AND S&W patten M13 Aircrewmans, Ruger Service Sixes, S&W Model 12's, and S&W Model 15's). Also a loooooot of people that privately purchased sidearms (when one could get such a thing allowed) bought .38's, mostly Colt and S&W https://www.americanrifleman.org/art...ary-revolvers/ http://smith-wessonforum.com/s-w-rev...w-vietnam.html |
#24
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Looks like they're sticking with 9mm, but looking at new types of ammunition.
http://kitup.military.com/2017/01/mo...un-system.html
__________________
"Everything is impossible until somebody does it - Batman RIP Kevin Conroy, the one true Batman |
#25
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
They should try hollow points. I don't believe the US actually has signed any treaties that prevents them from not using them. I think we don't use them because of our allies, the same reason why we adopted the 9mm way back
__________________
![]() "There's a fine line between not listening and not caring...I like to think I walk that line everyday of my life." Blessed be the LORD, my rock, Who trains my hands for war, And my fingers for battle Psalm 144:1 “It is always wrong to use force, unless it is more wrong not to.” |
#26
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Even if we had signed treaties saying we couldn't use them, those treaties only ever apply to other signatories. Also terrorists are un-uniformed unlawful combatants so basically whatever needs to be done can be done no issue
|
#27
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I thought the US armed forces administered IQ tests to filter out new recruits. "Private SNAFUs" aren't highly desired commodities now, are they?
Quote:
Apparently SIG-Sauer also discontinued its previous modular handgun, the Sig P250, now that the P320 was accepted. |
#28
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
They administer the Armed Services Vocational Aptitude Battery (ASVAB) and the Armed Forces Qualification Test (AFQT). They do filter out the worst, but the Army is large and Pvt. SNAFUs get through. They get into the more selective branches as well like the Air Force and the Coast Guard.
|
#29
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
That said I find it funny the SIG deal has kinda come full-circle. I really think they should have gone with the 226 before. Guess they'll get their turn now though. All-told, I'm cool with this.
__________________
"..If someone has a gun and is trying to kill you - It would be reasonable to shoot back with your own gun." - The Dalai Lama |
#30
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Realistically, there's nothing actually wrong with the Beretta design as a whole. It just had problems being maintained in the field and at the time, felt kinda heavy compared to other guns of the era. The only real problem currently one might have is if you are dead set with today's training that has you racking the slide during a reload and people would accidentally make the weapon safe because of the frame mounted safety/decocker.
I personally don't see a point in the DA/SA type of trigger for an automatic handgun. It makes sense functionally for a revolver because it relates to the hammer and cylinder but not for a handgun with a slide and even if it is hammer fired. I think it was one of those safety options out of fear of negligence, like how Browning originally intended the 1911 to have no safety of any kind, neither manual safety or grip safety until the Army told him.
__________________
![]() "There's a fine line between not listening and not caring...I like to think I walk that line everyday of my life." Blessed be the LORD, my rock, Who trains my hands for war, And my fingers for battle Psalm 144:1 “It is always wrong to use force, unless it is more wrong not to.” |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|