imfdb.org  

Go Back   imfdb.org > The Forum > Off Topic

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #31  
Old 05-14-2011, 04:07 PM
MT2008's Avatar
MT2008 MT2008 is offline
IMFDB & Forum Admin
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 2,612
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by funkychinaman View Post
If he were just a troll, why would he care if he was permanently banned? I would think it'd be easier just to go troll another board rather than try to get back on everyone's good graces.

Does he insult people? Does he personally attack anyone? (Again, I haven't really follow the Randomness thread, so I don't know.) From what I can tell, he just zealously defends his own unpopular viewpoints in a somewhat rational way. (Viewpoints I don't agree with, mind you.)
I'm not saying Burt is an out-and-out "troll" - but I would say that some of what he does is pretty close to trolling. You are correct that he doesn't go out of his way just to insult people or attack people. But the fact is that he does seem to enjoy baiting people into arguing with him. In some cases, I think this reflects poorly on those people (i.e. Zulu, who got temp-banned again for being pugnacious and responding to Burt by trying to talk like a gangsta). But I think we can't just pretend that he doesn't know what he's doing. That makes him culpable, and the fact that he's been involved in so much shit means we still have to consider him a problem. He may not be malicious, necessarily, but he seems to give in to temptation way too easily.

Quote:
Originally Posted by funkychinaman View Post
He's at least guilty of having poor social skills.

I don't know the man. I've never interacted with him beyond this board, nor do I wish to. But he never struck me as being a bad egg, just someone who someone doesn't know when to shut up. I'm sure you all know people like that in your life, and you know not all of them are bad people.
You say Burt is guilty of "poor social skills" as if that's a reason we can't ban him. I disagree. In real life, having poor social skills means you have no right to complain about being ostracized if you offend enough people (not getting invited to parties or other group social events). While message boards aren't real life (obviously), a similar idea applies: If someone's annoying enough, they can be excluded from the group. That's why I started this topic - we're deciding, collectively, whether to exclude Burt from the group.

And yes, you're right that having poor social skills doesn't make someone a bad person. Nobody's saying Burt is bad, unless he tries to prove otherwise. That's why I'm not ready to just ban Burt the way that other problematic posters have been banned.

Quote:
Originally Posted by funkychinaman View Post
I think it IS pretty significant that this thread exists.
I do, too. This is not a decision I can make easily, and it's not one that I'm willing to make without consulting with everyone first. I'm not outright in favor of banning Burt - I'm mostly just divided about it right now.

Quote:
Originally Posted by funkychinaman View Post
Neither PoI, Sillybunz, ReelViagra4Cheep or any other user looking at a ban ever got this sort of attention. They just got outright banned.
As Predator20 pointed out, POI got a thread. He also had a temp ban before that. Also, for the record, Funkychinaman, didn't you also try to defend PoI in that same thread?
__________________
Cry "Havoc," and let slip the hogs of war.

Last edited by MT2008; 05-14-2011 at 04:30 PM.
  #32  
Old 05-14-2011, 04:10 PM
Excalibur's Avatar
Excalibur Excalibur is offline
IMFDB Admin
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: USA
Posts: 3,842
Send a message via AIM to Excalibur Send a message via MSN to Excalibur Send a message via Yahoo to Excalibur
Default

Have we talked to him recently and told him about this?
__________________

"There's a fine line between not listening and not caring...I like to think I walk that line everyday of my life."

Blessed be the LORD, my rock, Who trains my hands for war, And my fingers for battle
Psalm 144:1

“It is always wrong to use force, unless it is more wrong not to.”
  #33  
Old 05-14-2011, 04:30 PM
MT2008's Avatar
MT2008 MT2008 is offline
IMFDB & Forum Admin
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 2,612
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Excalibur View Post
Have we talked to him recently and told him about this?
No, not yet. Let's decide first.
__________________
Cry "Havoc," and let slip the hogs of war.
  #34  
Old 05-14-2011, 05:24 PM
Reach Reach is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 87
Default

final vote: perma-ban
  #35  
Old 05-14-2011, 05:34 PM
k9870's Avatar
k9870 k9870 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Maine
Posts: 4,255
Default

I agree with permanent. And even if it ends up being a temp ban and he came back, the next ban would need to be permanent.
__________________
"I don't need luck, I have ammo!"

Grunt, Mass effect 3
  #36  
Old 05-15-2011, 05:02 AM
funkychinaman's Avatar
funkychinaman funkychinaman is offline
IMFDB & Forum Admin
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Bucks County, PA
Posts: 2,621
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MT2008 View Post
Also, for the record, Funkychinaman, didn't you also try to defend PoI in that same thread?
I really don't remember. I guess I'm just willing to give people the benefit of the doubt.
__________________
"Me fail English? That's unpossible!"

Last edited by funkychinaman; 05-15-2011 at 05:02 AM. Reason: typo
  #37  
Old 05-15-2011, 06:28 AM
funkychinaman's Avatar
funkychinaman funkychinaman is offline
IMFDB & Forum Admin
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Bucks County, PA
Posts: 2,621
Default

I looked at my old posts, and I found that thread. I don't think I was trying to defend POI as much as get some clarification. I got all the clarification I needed a few posts later from POI himself.
__________________
"Me fail English? That's unpossible!"
  #38  
Old 05-15-2011, 07:49 AM
Evil Tim's Avatar
Evil Tim Evil Tim is offline
IMFDB & Forum Admin
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: The surface of the sun
Posts: 740
Default

I'd say permaban, if not because I'm fairly sure he's POI again then because his ratio of causing trouble to actually contributing is so completely skewed toward the former; in the whole time he's been here he's never uploaded a single image. I don't think anything of value will be lost.
  #39  
Old 05-15-2011, 03:21 PM
funkychinaman's Avatar
funkychinaman funkychinaman is offline
IMFDB & Forum Admin
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Bucks County, PA
Posts: 2,621
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Evil Tim View Post
I'd say permaban, if not because I'm fairly sure he's POI again then because his ratio of causing trouble to actually contributing is so completely skewed toward the former; in the whole time he's been here he's never uploaded a single image. I don't think anything of value will be lost.
Burt actually chime in on the POI banning thread mentioned above, as do several admitted POI sock puppets. That he'd sign in using several obvious sock puppets and one good disguise in one thread seems unlikely. (Or we've been severely underestimating him.) And if you recall, POI tried coming back as himself a few months afterwards.
__________________
"Me fail English? That's unpossible!"
  #40  
Old 05-15-2011, 04:11 PM
Reach Reach is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 87
Default

Person-Of-Intrest
Burt-Reynolds-Moustache
same form of name. same type of person. im convinced they're the same.
Closed Thread

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 01:16 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.