imfdb.org  

Go Back   imfdb.org > The Forum > Off Topic

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #31  
Old 10-16-2009, 04:53 PM
predator20's Avatar
predator20 predator20 is offline
IMFDB Admin
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: FL
Posts: 767
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ace Oliveira View Post
That "What me worry" thing is from Mad Magazine.
Look:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alfred_E._Neuman

Check the cultural impact section. They reference Platoon in the last paragraph. I seen a few soldiers in vietnam with Alfred E. Neuman in their helmets. Seems to me the actor that played the Lieutenent knew about that.

I hate how some soldiers in the movie don't wear helmets. Elias never wears a helmet through the entire movie. I seen a lot of soldiers say that they would never go into battle withouth a helmet. Especially because in Vietnam most soldiers would customize their helmets. They would become attached to them. The helmet became a personal item and part of the uniform.

Also, i'm the only one that thinks it's hilarious that Dale Dye wanted to make a cameo as a dead body being carried away in a body bag?
I didn't even notice Elias not wearing a helmet. I guess since he didn't wear one throughout the entire film it's not as noticeable.

Dye said they need a body for the body bag. So he volunteered so it would be full weight.
Reply With Quote
  #32  
Old 10-16-2009, 05:31 PM
Ace Oliveira Ace Oliveira is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 345
Default

I just bought a Platoon DVD. It's going to arrive at my house in about 4 or 5 days.
Reply With Quote
  #33  
Old 10-16-2009, 06:02 PM
predator20's Avatar
predator20 predator20 is offline
IMFDB Admin
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: FL
Posts: 767
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ace Oliveira View Post
I just bought a Platoon DVD. It's going to arrive at my house in about 4 or 5 days.
Which DVD did you buy? Mine is the $10 special edition listed at Amazon. After I bought it, they come out with the 2-disc collectors edition. Pissed me off. I'm too cheap to buy it again, even though there are more features it seems like.
Reply With Quote
  #34  
Old 10-16-2009, 06:05 PM
Ace Oliveira Ace Oliveira is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 345
Default

The special edition. For 19,90 reais. Pretty nice for such a famous movie.
Reply With Quote
  #35  
Old 10-16-2009, 07:42 PM
MT2008's Avatar
MT2008 MT2008 is offline
IMFDB & Forum Admin
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 2,612
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Spartan198 View Post
Probably, if it only has one pilot and you put that round through his head.
Here, it was through the engine. Of course, because the production was so low-budget and they didn't want to wreck a real Huey, the crash was depicted by showing the chopper parked in the middle of a paddy with fake smoke emitters, and the pilot shown lying dead nearby.
Reply With Quote
  #36  
Old 10-16-2009, 07:44 PM
MT2008's Avatar
MT2008 MT2008 is offline
IMFDB & Forum Admin
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 2,612
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mandolin View Post
The ARVN was, as MT2008 pointed out, largley inept and incompetent. However, their marines, airborne, and some other units made the US Army look bad. They could operate efectivly in the jungle, kept their weapons clean, and overal were very good. Try reading Norman Schwarzkopf's autobiography, or Battle Ready by Tom Clancy and Gen. Tony Zinni. The VC/ NVA perspective would be alternating between running from B-52 raids, hiding in tunnels systems, and sapper attacks. What would be realy interesting, though, would be a movie from the perspective of South Korean Marines. They made almost all US units look bad. They were a bunch of little karate masters running around the jungles with M16s, to the detriment of any bad guys in the area.
Interesting.

As for an NVA/VC film, I think I'd be interesting. It might dissuade all of the "Red Dawn" fans who think they could wage a guerrilla war against a Soviet-type invading force on American soil. From what I've read, those guys went through utter hell, and yet they still kept fighting.
Reply With Quote
  #37  
Old 10-16-2009, 08:03 PM
Ace Oliveira Ace Oliveira is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 345
Default

That's what made the North win the war. For some reason the Victor Charlie and PAVN didn't give up. They simply won't give up. We would throw everything at them and they would just fight back or hide. I could never figure out why they didn't give up.
Reply With Quote
  #38  
Old 10-16-2009, 08:20 PM
MT2008's Avatar
MT2008 MT2008 is offline
IMFDB & Forum Admin
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 2,612
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ace Oliveira View Post
That's what made the North win the war. For some reason the Victor Charlie and PAVN didn't give up. They simply won't give up. We would throw everything at them and they would just fight back or hide. I could never figure out why they didn't give up.
Because poor people make tough soldiers, especially guerrillas. And in the 1960s, almost nobody in the world was as poor as the Vietnamese peasantry. They can endure conditions that most of our soldiers can't.

Of course, the VC was not quite as good as sometimes thought. One thing that's often overlooked is that they were on the retreat by 1972.
Reply With Quote
  #39  
Old 10-16-2009, 08:34 PM
Ace Oliveira Ace Oliveira is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 345
Default

That's true. The Charlie didn't actually scare US soldiers though. They inflicted heavy casualties but they weren't some kind of boogeyman to the US personnel. And as the war progressed, the Vietcong got more and more conventional. During the 1960s they were guerrillas but after 1972 the North made them more conventional. Till 1975 they got integrated into the Vietnam Army. That was just after the war thought.
Reply With Quote
  #40  
Old 10-21-2009, 01:40 PM
Ace Oliveira Ace Oliveira is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 345
Default

Alright, i got the Platoon DVD yesterday. I watched it then i watched the movie with the Oliver Stone commentary on.

It seems most of the stuff Oliver says in the commentary contradicts what most civilians think about the Vietnam War and the United States after they see the movie. Hell, he called some of the American soldiers he meet there "Natural Born Warriors". He never says anything bad about the real Ssgt Barnes. The real Barnes seemed like a nice guy. Got shot in the head and survived, married a japanese women and came back to Vietnam. He never says anything bad about the real Tex while the Tex in the movie looked like someone that would side with movie Barnes in the Village scene. Stone said the real Lt. Wolfe was a nice guy. Something i found funny was how he said the "good ole boys" were good soldiers. Which i found weird because all the rednecks in the movie are assholes with confederate flags in their barracks and commited war crimes. I found all that confusing. His movie shows the platoon being full of war criminals even though Stone seems to talk more about how you can't really blame the soldiers for acting like dicks to the new guys and shooting civilians because they are tired and they felt like shit in the jungle. It's almost like he is apologizing for what the soldiers are doing in the movie.

Also, Stone didn't talk about Ace. The only thing he said is that Ace is or was a Radio writer from Texas. I don't know if he was referring to Ace in that particular scene though.

Now i'm off to watch the Dale Dye commentary.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 05:00 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.