imfdb.org  

Go Back   imfdb.org > The Forum > Just Guns

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #31  
Old 11-15-2009, 01:02 AM
Yournamehere Yournamehere is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 912
Default

The 4506 is still in production as the 4506 TSW I believe, and in my opinion, it seems to be a champ. It's a .45 Automatic made by Smith & Wesson. Their 3rd gens are very reliable and durable with their stainless steel construction. On my long list of guns to get for my collection, it's on there around mid range. Right now I'm looking for a Browning Hi-Power though.
Reply With Quote
  #32  
Old 11-15-2009, 01:18 AM
MT2008's Avatar
MT2008 MT2008 is offline
IMFDB & Forum Admin
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 2,612
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Yournamehere View Post
The 4506 is still in production as the 4506 TSW I believe
Nope. There's a 4056 TSW, but that's not the same gun. None of the TSW line are as big as the 4506 was.

Quote:
Originally Posted by k9870 View Post
The 4506 (and smith 3rd gens in general) are known to eat anything you feed them
Except reloads, unfortunately. But then, my Dad wasn't really sure how to do reliable .45 ACP loads, only .45 Long Colt (which is what he shoots more often). I think we might be able to make better ones next time, though.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ace Oliveira View Post
I think 4506s would do a pretty good job for a Military sidearm. The only problem would be how many bullets the thing has. It only has Eight bullets.
Quote:
Originally Posted by k9870 View Post
9 rounds of 45 acp is plenty. In the miltiary, a sidearm is a last ditch attempt weapon, basically its better than a pointy stick for helping you get to a new rifle. In law enforcement and self defense, if 9 doesn't do it, you're screwed anyway. I feel 1911s deliver good firepower for their prpose, and so do other single stack autos.
Yeah, I agree, .45 ACP is meant to be used in single-stack pistols, anyway. Double-stack .45s tend to be too thick for people without big hands. And for a sidearm in that caliber, 8-9 rounds is enough.

Anyway, the bigger problem for the 4506 becoming a military sidearm is the fact that it's not made anymore. I can also say (since I actually own a 4506) that it's a bit large and heavy, especially at a time when polymer-framed pistols are in style. As I've said before, I think the Smith & Wesson 4566 probably makes way more sense for most people, since it's not quite as big. Though admittedly, I've never seen/held/fired one before, so I'm not sure, but that is my intuition.

Last edited by MT2008; 11-15-2009 at 01:28 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #33  
Old 11-15-2009, 01:31 AM
Yournamehere Yournamehere is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 912
Default

Damn, I was thinking of the 4566 TSW, which is, again, not the same gun, but a similar one. I saw somewhere someone specifically mention a 4506 TSW, which would make sense, but I can't find anything else on it. Weird.
Reply With Quote
  #34  
Old 12-12-2009, 12:05 AM
S&Wshooter's Avatar
S&Wshooter S&Wshooter is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Texas
Posts: 4,936
Default

Heavy? All the better for pistol whipping people! . I don't like the decocker though because I can't keep it "cocked and locked" like my POS High Standard
__________________
Get off of my property


http://www.introvertisland.com
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 05:29 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.