imfdb.org  

Go Back   imfdb.org > The Forum > Off Topic

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #41  
Old 06-14-2009, 10:23 PM
Gunmaster45's Avatar
Gunmaster45 Gunmaster45 is offline
IMFDB Admin
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: New York, USA
Posts: 1,779
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by AdAstra2009 View Post
I dunno about you but I wouldn't mind having a full-auto.
I'm sure there is no need to go over the tactical advantages of fully-automatic fire.
Full-autos are fun to shoot but when it comes down to it, a semi-auto is more useful in many cases. People with poor training or people under extreme stress (which is pretty common when shooting at other people) tends to waste ammo when not necessary. And with good trigger control you could put three rounds into the same target with better control, and three rounds is pretty much all you need.

Sorry if I sound like a rocking chair commando with all my "combat experiance" .
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #42  
Old 06-14-2009, 11:10 PM
AdAstra2009's Avatar
AdAstra2009 AdAstra2009 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Maryland
Posts: 1,067
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Gunmaster45 View Post
Full-autos are fun to shoot but when it comes down to it, a semi-auto is more useful in many cases. People with poor training or people under extreme stress (which is pretty common when shooting at other people) tends to waste ammo when not necessary. And with good trigger control you could put three rounds into the same target with better control, and three rounds is pretty much all you need.

Sorry if I sound like a rocking chair commando with all my "combat experiance" .
Most guns however are not full-auto only so you can have both semi-automatic and fully-automatic fire.

I'm not saying a fully-automatic/select fire should be a cash & carry gun -I'm just saying that they should lift the ban on the manufacture of firearms for the civilian market.
That way the cost of select fire weapons will not be ridiculously high (like $15,000 for a full-auto m14) simply because of the limited amount of pre-1986 automatics.

Remember only 2 people have been murdered with legally owned civilian machineguns since 1934, that's saying something.
Reply With Quote
  #43  
Old 06-14-2009, 11:51 PM
MT2008's Avatar
MT2008 MT2008 is offline
IMFDB & Forum Admin
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 2,612
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by AdAstra2009 View Post
Remember only 2 people have been murdered with legally owned civilian machineguns since 1934, that's saying something.
Well, on the one hand, it says that the NFA basically worked. On the other hand, the fact that the FOPA was passed demonstrates why some gun control laws get passed for frivolous, stupid reasons, and why being skeptical of their intent is a very healthy mindset.
Reply With Quote
  #44  
Old 06-15-2009, 12:50 AM
AdAstra2009's Avatar
AdAstra2009 AdAstra2009 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Maryland
Posts: 1,067
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MT2008 View Post
Well, on the one hand, it says that the NFA basically worked.
Not necessarily.
You must have overlooked that I said legally owned civilian machine guns.

The statistics for illegally owned machineguns I'm sure is much higher for murders since 1934.

Just like when the brady campaign or whoever said that Assault Weapons murder had decreased it ignores the fact that murder rates stayed the same but they just occured with weapons other than assault weapons so there is no real difference.
Reply With Quote
  #45  
Old 06-15-2009, 04:08 AM
MT2008's Avatar
MT2008 MT2008 is offline
IMFDB & Forum Admin
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 2,612
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by AdAstra2009 View Post
Not necessarily.
You must have overlooked that I said legally owned civilian machine guns.

The statistics for illegally owned machineguns I'm sure is much higher for murders since 1934.

Just like when the brady campaign or whoever said that Assault Weapons murder had decreased it ignores the fact that murder rates stayed the same but they just occured with weapons other than assault weapons so there is no real difference.
Actually, illegal machine gun use by criminals is very rare (contrary to what Hollywood often portrays).

I think it's kind of a moot point with the AWB because of the fact that for most classes of criminals, military-type weapons are a bit too expensive and unnecessary for their purposes.
Reply With Quote
  #46  
Old 06-15-2009, 04:13 PM
AdAstra2009's Avatar
AdAstra2009 AdAstra2009 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Maryland
Posts: 1,067
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MT2008 View Post
Actually, illegal machine gun use by criminals is very rare (contrary to what Hollywood often portrays).
True but I know for a fact that more than 2 people have been murdered with an illegally owned machine-gun since 1934.
Reply With Quote
  #47  
Old 06-16-2009, 04:03 AM
Excalibur's Avatar
Excalibur Excalibur is offline
IMFDB Admin
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: USA
Posts: 3,842
Send a message via AIM to Excalibur Send a message via MSN to Excalibur Send a message via Yahoo to Excalibur
Default

But it really isn't like stret punks can walk around the corner and just find some guy they has "the connections" and can get a full auto AK47. Most confiscated guns I've been seeing are little pee shooters
__________________

"There's a fine line between not listening and not caring...I like to think I walk that line everyday of my life."

Blessed be the LORD, my rock, Who trains my hands for war, And my fingers for battle
Psalm 144:1

“It is always wrong to use force, unless it is more wrong not to.”
Reply With Quote
  #48  
Old 06-16-2009, 04:07 AM
MT2008's Avatar
MT2008 MT2008 is offline
IMFDB & Forum Admin
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 2,612
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by AdAstra2009 View Post
True but I know for a fact that more than 2 people have been murdered with an illegally owned machine-gun since 1934.
Oh, no doubt. But I'm pretty sure that there were more criminals using machine guns back in the days when Tommy Guns could be bought at Sears, versus today.

Also, many of those being used in crimes today seem to be converted from semi-autos. The North Hollywood bank robbers, for instance, used Norinco AKs, an HK91, and a custom-built AR-15, all converted illegally to full-auto.
Reply With Quote
  #49  
Old 06-16-2009, 04:34 AM
Gunmaster45's Avatar
Gunmaster45 Gunmaster45 is offline
IMFDB Admin
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: New York, USA
Posts: 1,779
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MT2008 View Post
Also, many of those being used in crimes today seem to be converted from semi-autos. The North Hollywood bank robbers, for instance, used Norinco AKs, an HK91, and a custom-built AR-15, all converted illegally to full-auto.
Don't you mean two Romanian and one Hungarian AKM variant?
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #50  
Old 06-16-2009, 04:44 AM
MT2008's Avatar
MT2008 MT2008 is offline
IMFDB & Forum Admin
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 2,612
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Gunmaster45 View Post
Don't you mean two Romanian and one Hungarian AKM variant?
I think that was just in the movie. From what I remember, the ones used in the actual shootout were all pre-89 Norinco Type 56S.

Then again, maybe Thell Reed did better research than me. The M16 he built for the movie was pretty close to the one used in the actual shootout (going by the picture that GunNutHK posted).
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 10:09 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.