imfdb.org  

Go Back   imfdb.org > The Forum > imfdb

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #31  
Old 03-29-2012, 06:16 AM
funkychinaman's Avatar
funkychinaman funkychinaman is offline
IMFDB & Forum Admin
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Bucks County, PA
Posts: 2,578
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by AdAstra2009 View Post
Don't delete it, just revert it to the old Doom movie page. Right now, all the links that used to link to the Doom movie are going to the Doom disambiguation page, and that's a lot of links.
__________________
"Me fail English? That's unpossible!"
Reply With Quote
  #32  
Old 03-29-2012, 06:25 AM
funkychinaman's Avatar
funkychinaman funkychinaman is offline
IMFDB & Forum Admin
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Bucks County, PA
Posts: 2,578
Default

Since we're on video games of the early nineties, what are your thoughts on the two below? The sort of snuck in a few months ago.

http://www.imfdb.org/wiki/Streets_of_Rage_Remake

http://www.imfdb.org/wiki/Punisher,_..._video_game%29
__________________
"Me fail English? That's unpossible!"
Reply With Quote
  #33  
Old 03-29-2012, 06:41 AM
Evil Tim's Avatar
Evil Tim Evil Tim is offline
IMFDB & Forum Admin
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: The surface of the sun
Posts: 740
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by AdAstra2009 View Post
While it needs bringing up to standard, the guns were digitised from real props and if nothing else it's needed to address the belief by some (including the uploader and the Doom Wiki itself) that the pistol was a real weapon. I've fixed the links to the way they were before, though.
Reply With Quote
  #34  
Old 03-29-2012, 06:45 AM
Evil Tim's Avatar
Evil Tim Evil Tim is offline
IMFDB & Forum Admin
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: The surface of the sun
Posts: 740
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by funkychinaman View Post
Since we're on video games of the early nineties, what are your thoughts on the two below? The sort of snuck in a few months ago.

http://www.imfdb.org/wiki/Streets_of_Rage_Remake

http://www.imfdb.org/wiki/Punisher,_..._video_game%29
Mr. X's Thompson is real enough, but SoR: Remake is a fan project, not a released game (it's a ROMhack with hi-def graphics and elements of all three released games). Deleted.

Punisher, the drawn scenes are pretty close to the ID'd guns, but there's some that are really pushing it; the guy's arm shouldn't be there, and there's no real way the launcher is supposed to be an FGM-148 in 1993 since they'd only test-fired the first working launcher that year.
Reply With Quote
  #35  
Old 03-29-2012, 06:47 AM
funkychinaman's Avatar
funkychinaman funkychinaman is offline
IMFDB & Forum Admin
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Bucks County, PA
Posts: 2,578
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Evil Tim View Post
While it needs bringing up to standard, the guns were digitised from real props and if nothing else it's needed to address the belief by some (including the uploader and the Doom Wiki itself) that the pistol was a real weapon. I've fixed the links to the way they were before, though.
The talk page for the doom movie is sort of in limbo though. The link on the pages for both the game and the movie both link to the talk page for the game.
__________________
"Me fail English? That's unpossible!"
Reply With Quote
  #36  
Old 03-29-2012, 07:26 PM
AdAstra2009's Avatar
AdAstra2009 AdAstra2009 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Maryland
Posts: 1,067
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by funkychinaman View Post
Really??? That thing on his arm is suppose to be an M202 Flash????

Also there is no need to retain the Doom VG page due to links, nothing links to that page!

Last edited by AdAstra2009; 03-29-2012 at 07:28 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #37  
Old 03-29-2012, 07:51 PM
funkychinaman's Avatar
funkychinaman funkychinaman is offline
IMFDB & Forum Admin
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Bucks County, PA
Posts: 2,578
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by AdAstra2009 View Post
Really??? That thing on his arm is suppose to be an M202 Flash????

Also there is no need to retain the Doom VG page due to links, nothing links to that page!
Not now, Tim fixed it last night.
__________________
"Me fail English? That's unpossible!"
Reply With Quote
  #38  
Old 03-29-2012, 07:59 PM
funkychinaman's Avatar
funkychinaman funkychinaman is offline
IMFDB & Forum Admin
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Bucks County, PA
Posts: 2,578
Default

Two more for review: (We really should have a "Questionable Eligibility" thread)

http://www.imfdb.org/wiki/Kilo

It's a short film, submitted by the guy who created the At Bay page. Even if you wanted to grandfather it in a short film, I don't think it meets the distribution requirements.

http://www.imfdb.org/wiki/Biohazard_4D:_Executer

Again, a short film, and despite being from the Biohazard/Resident Evil franchise, I'm not sure it meets the distribution requirement. When you google it, it's only available for download.
__________________
"Me fail English? That's unpossible!"
Reply With Quote
  #39  
Old 03-29-2012, 09:56 PM
Vangelis Vangelis is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 185
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by funkychinaman View Post
http://www.imfdb.org/wiki/Biohazard_4D:_Executer

Again, a short film, and despite being from the Biohazard/Resident Evil franchise, I'm not sure it meets the distribution requirement. When you google it, it's only available for download.
According to Wikipedia, it has been screened in actual movie theatres in Japan, which would meet the distribution guideline. But it's still 19 minutes long. I'm loathe to delete a well-made page, though, I'll wait for a second opinion.
Reply With Quote
  #40  
Old 03-29-2012, 10:23 PM
funkychinaman's Avatar
funkychinaman funkychinaman is offline
IMFDB & Forum Admin
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Bucks County, PA
Posts: 2,578
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Vangelis View Post
According to Wikipedia, it has been screened in actual movie theatres in Japan, which would meet the distribution guideline. But it's still 19 minutes long. I'm loathe to delete a well-made page, though, I'll wait for a second opinion.
I don't dispute that, but I don't think it's legally available on home video. I'm wondering if it violates the piracy related rules.
__________________
"Me fail English? That's unpossible!"
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 06:20 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.