#11
|
||||
|
||||
the 1882 has a longer cylinder.
maybe a hint, like, caliber? Last edited by k9870; 01-12-2010 at 04:58 PM. |
#12
|
||||
|
||||
It is a 1891 9.4mm dutch colonial revovler.
Last edited by k9870; 01-13-2010 at 01:44 AM. |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
And the winner is... ^
|
#14
|
||||
|
||||
Lets just have nyles confirm this and ill post the next gun....time to search for a good one.
|
#15
|
||||
|
||||
Ill actually psot the next one since i think i got it right:
|
#16
|
|||
|
|||
You did - and you see why I didn't give the calibre. It would give it away in a hurry.
|
#17
|
||||
|
||||
Can anyone gues sthe one i posted? I justr had to blur the name on the slide
|
#18
|
||||
|
||||
Is it a Springfield?
|
#19
|
||||
|
||||
That's one ugly 1911
|
#20
|
||||
|
||||
well, its not a springer, and its only part 1911. Its more a hybrid gun.....the reason it failed.
|
|
|