#11
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
Or maybe a new lower with a fixed magazine that would be compatible with a regular upper? The rounds would have to be loaded from the bottom. You'd be able to eliminate the pistol grip as well if necessary.
__________________
"Me fail English? That's unpossible!" |
#12
|
||||
|
||||
You don't need to remind me, hence the title of this thread. These are the same people who outlawed .50 cal rifles based solely on the scene in ''SWAT'' when Jeremy Renner shot down the LAPD chopper with one, after all.
__________________
"Everything is impossible until somebody does it - Batman RIP Kevin Conroy, the one true Batman |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
If this bill passed (as devastating as it would be for California firearms owners who it would affect) I would actually be curious to see what solutions the firearms industry would come up with. |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Really? Is that really the reason? Were .50 cal rifles Cali-legal before that movie?
__________________
I like to think, that before that Navy SEAL double tapped bin Laden in the head, he kicked him, so that we could truly say we put a boot in his ass. |
#15
|
||||
|
||||
They do make Stripper clip fed AR15 lowers. To use them you break the reciver and shove in the rounds. Before I moved to a free state I looked at buying one but it wouldn't be economic to convert it to a standard reciver so I didn't get one.
|
#16
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
10characterlimitsux
__________________
"Everything is impossible until somebody does it - Batman RIP Kevin Conroy, the one true Batman |
#17
|
||||
|
||||
Just get a railed forearm and mount the optic on the fore-grip. Though this will only work with red-dot type sights and not a conventional telescopic sight.
|
#18
|
||||
|
||||
Well, if you absolutely had to put it on a rail you could probably get away with a long eye relief scope on the foregrip. Though you'd be better off putting an AK-style side bracket on the lower, though you'd have to extend / alter the left-hand side controls to make it fit.
|
|
|