![]() |
#11
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
|
#12
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
Looking into the wording of that ban it kind of reads like they banned it because they misunderstood what it was. It reads "The factory brochure claims that the grenade launcher launches a 22 mm (approximately .80 caliber) grenade." To me this reads as if they banned it based on the "the barrel or barrels of which have a bore of more than one-half inch in diameter" part of the DD definition. This is not the case with this gun though, as the 22mm is the external rather than internal diameter. Also, and this is a more general US gun law question, can a state deem something to be a destructive device? Isn't this defined by the NFA and overseen by the BATF, not the California DOJ? Granted, they could still ban the firearm by name but that isn't what they did in this case. Either way, looking into it you can still legally have a Yugo SKS in CA, you just need to either remove the grenade launcher itself, or make it incapable of a grenade sliding over it by doing something like welding on a sleeve, or even just laying down a line of weld. |
#13
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I'd imagine a state would define it since the US is a federal rather than a unitary state, so any power not explicitly reserved by the central government belongs to the state governments. State can say how it's going to enforce a Federal law and as long as they're not playing too loose with the description that's ok, IIRC.
Last edited by Evil Tim; 01-21-2017 at 09:35 AM. |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
My advice would be don't go to CA.
![]() Quote:
Quote:
__________________
"..If someone has a gun and is trying to kill you - It would be reasonable to shoot back with your own gun." - The Dalai Lama |
![]() |
|
|