Gun trends you dont understand....

[S&Wshooter]

Originally Posted by Yournamehere

I thought we went over this once before. The squared trigger guard shave just as much space as the rounded trigger guards (in both 2nd and 3rd Gen models) if not more space.

Last time I was a Collectors I held 2 S&W autos that were almost exactly the same side-by-side. One had a rounded guard and one had a squared guard.
Squared trigger guard was a tiny bit smaller, but that tiny bit made a difference

[BurtReynoldsMoustache]

Originally Posted by MT2008

That's a good one. I've never fired a shotgun with an M4 stock, but does it really offer any advantage over the traditional side- or top-folding stocks? Or do people use them just for the sake of looking "tacticool"?

And of course, it goes without saying that anyone who sticks an M4 stock on their Ruger 10/22 is a poser.

[Clutch]

Originally Posted by BurtReynoldsMoustache

Weirdly, that ALMOST looks like it makes sense.

[MT2008]

Originally Posted by Clutch

Weirdly, that ALMOST looks like it makes sense.

An M4 stock on an RPG? I don't think so. If you extended it out to full length and tried to fire it that way, you'd be just in front of the back blast.

And it must look hideously awkward just holding it that way...

[Rockwolf66]

Originally Posted by MT2008

And of course, it goes without saying that anyone who sticks an M4 stock on their Ruger 10/22 is a poser.

Well I have an Archangel stock on my 10/22, I guess I'm a poser then.

It does in fact come in hands when you have at least six inches in height on your GF.

[MT2008]

Originally Posted by Rockwolf66

Well I have an Archangel stock on my 10/22, I guess I'm a poser then.

It does in fact come in hands when you have at least six inches in height on your GF.

Yep, sure are.