imfdb.org  

Go Back   imfdb.org > The Forum > Guns & Movies

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 11-05-2009, 12:11 AM
Excalibur's Avatar
Excalibur Excalibur is offline
IMFDB Admin
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: USA
Posts: 3,842
Send a message via AIM to Excalibur Send a message via MSN to Excalibur Send a message via Yahoo to Excalibur
Default

They shoulda made this movie years ago if they wanted a sequel. It's a bit too late for one and no Defoe
__________________

"There's a fine line between not listening and not caring...I like to think I walk that line everyday of my life."

Blessed be the LORD, my rock, Who trains my hands for war, And my fingers for battle
Psalm 144:1

“It is always wrong to use force, unless it is more wrong not to.”
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 11-06-2009, 02:49 PM
Jcordell Jcordell is offline
Formerly "Checkman"
IMFDB Admin
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Idaho
Posts: 1,034
Default

Ahhh the movie business. I have a PBS documentary mini-series about Hollywood. It aired approximately fifteen years ago and it's excellent. Many people in the business gave interviews. One of the people to be interviewed was Mr. Heston. He had a great saying about the movie biz. I'm paraphrasing here, but it's still on the mark.

"The trouble with movie making as a business is that it's art. The trouble with movie making as art is that it's a business."

What a great description for what seems to me to be such a Helter - Skelter world. I'm a move buff and a layman so my observations are that of an outsider of course.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 11-07-2009, 02:33 PM
MT2008's Avatar
MT2008 MT2008 is offline
IMFDB & Forum Admin
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 2,619
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Excalibur View Post
They shoulda made this movie years ago if they wanted a sequel. It's a bit too late for one and no Defoe
Well, the sequel did pretty well in its limited run...it made over $500,000 last weekend, which sounds tiny, but actually is pretty good considering it was released in 70 theaters. They're going to expand it to other markets next week.

Also, while I agree that Dafoe was pretty important to the original, let's not lose focus of the facts here...the original was a pretty bad movie itself. Reviews I've read so far say that the sequel is better in comparison, but the bar was pretty low to start.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 11-07-2009, 02:55 PM
Ace Oliveira Ace Oliveira is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 345
Default

The first movie had it's moments but it kind sucked.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 11-07-2009, 04:00 PM
Excalibur's Avatar
Excalibur Excalibur is offline
IMFDB Admin
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: USA
Posts: 3,842
Send a message via AIM to Excalibur Send a message via MSN to Excalibur Send a message via Yahoo to Excalibur
Default

I thought the first movie was pretty good
__________________

"There's a fine line between not listening and not caring...I like to think I walk that line everyday of my life."

Blessed be the LORD, my rock, Who trains my hands for war, And my fingers for battle
Psalm 144:1

“It is always wrong to use force, unless it is more wrong not to.”
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 11-07-2009, 04:07 PM
Ace Oliveira Ace Oliveira is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 345
Default

The lines were just ridiculous.

The first movie could have been a cheesy, tongue in cheek action movie or a serious action film.

It tried to be both. And it failed. Tremendously.

Willem Dafoe was the only good thing about it. That is, because all of his scenes are in the tongue in cheek style. Willem Dafoe is just simply awesome. The underworld scene in Platoon was in tongue and cheek style and was one of the great scenes in the movie. I mean, we got a Grassmask AND a Remington Wingmaster being used as an bong. I mean, come on!
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 11-07-2009, 07:59 PM
MT2008's Avatar
MT2008 MT2008 is offline
IMFDB & Forum Admin
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 2,619
Default

I enjoyed the first "Boondock Saints", but objectively speaking, it's still a rip-off of "Pulp Fiction" and a whole bunch of other movies.

For me, most of its appeal comes not from the film itself, but from how you watch it and who you watch it with. Some of my best memories from college, freshman year, were watching this film with my roommates when we were all drunk and eating pizza or take-out Chinese (kind of the way that the Saints were in the movie, before they shot the cat). Somehow, the "Boondock Saints" manages to be the perfect film for those kinds of occasions.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 01-04-2010, 05:59 PM
Swordfish941's Avatar
Swordfish941 Swordfish941 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Fishers, Indiana
Posts: 3,228
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MT2008 View Post
I enjoyed the first "Boondock Saints", but objectively speaking, it's still a rip-off of "Pulp Fiction" and a whole bunch of other movies.

For me, most of its appeal comes not from the film itself, but from how you watch it and who you watch it with. Some of my best memories from college, freshman year, were watching this film with my roommates when we were all drunk and eating pizza or take-out Chinese (kind of the way that the Saints were in the movie, before they shot the cat). Somehow, the "Boondock Saints" manages to be the perfect film for those kinds of occasions.
The movie still seems original to me. I say that these "rip-offs" are actually homages to them. Anyway, what university did you go to? I'm planning to go to Norte Damne since my Aunt and Uncle (who are authors) live there.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 03:32 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.