Question about Machine Pistol

[Bugabear]

Well I think its because the bolt and everything else is much lighter than say a submachine gun or an Assault rifle. I'd like to get a CZ 75 auto because it has a compensator and you can use a extra mag as a foregrip but I'm too lazy to do all the paperwork necessary. But if you're in the army in real combat the only time you'd need a Machine Pistol is if your bodyguarding. Machine pistols are okay for suppressive fire.

[Spartan198]

Originally Posted by Bugabear

But if you're in the army in real combat the only time you'd need a Machine Pistol is if your bodyguarding.

Personally I'd much rather have an M4 or CQB-R, even for VIP protection.

Full auto or not, a pistol is still a pistol.

[AdAstra2009]

Originally Posted by Bugabear

But if you're in the army in real combat the only time you'd need a Machine Pistol is if your bodyguarding.

I don't think a single Army in the world uses machine pistols.

Originally Posted by Spartan198

Personally I'd much rather have an M4 or CQB-R, even for VIP protection.

I wouldn't ,I think the main advantage of Submachineguns over Rifles is less chance of overpenetration -esp if you are a bodyguard in some public place with lots of people.