|
|
|
|
#1
10-16-2012, 05:17 PM
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
|
|
#2
10-17-2012, 04:22 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
You would think back in the old days, the President that is pro gun would be packing.
__________________
 "There's a fine line between not listening and not caring...I like to think I walk that line everyday of my life." Blessed be the LORD, my rock, Who trains my hands for war, And my fingers for battle Psalm 144:1 “It is always wrong to use force, unless it is more wrong not to.”
|
|
#3
10-17-2012, 06:47 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
if im ever president id shoulder carry a nice 1911. Nice gun, nice holster, nice suit. Nice pocket knife too. Then id get a call and pull out a lame out of date phone or something.
__________________
"I don't need luck, I have ammo!" Grunt, Mass effect 3
|
|
#4
10-17-2012, 07:08 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
I think the current setup works well. An unarmed president represents our willingness to work things out peacefully, his heavily armed bodyguards represent our capability for a more forceful alternative.
__________________
"Me fail English? That's unpossible!"
|
|
#5
10-17-2012, 07:38 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Just because you are armed, doesn't mean you are not willing to work things out. You're looking too deeply
__________________
"There's a fine line between not listening and not caring...I like to think I walk that line everyday of my life." Blessed be the LORD, my rock, Who trains my hands for war, And my fingers for battle Psalm 144:1 “It is always wrong to use force, unless it is more wrong not to.”
|
|
#6
10-17-2012, 10:37 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
I would highly doubt that the Secret Service these days would allow the President to carry a gun, if for no other reason than it would be a gun in the vicinity of the President which they were not in control of.
|
 |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Hybrid Mode
