|
|
|
|
#1
03-29-2012, 10:51 PM
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
I think a side-by-side comparison of the two types, pointing out the differences, would be a worthwhile addition to the AK gallery page similar to how the M16 gallery has close-ups of upper and lower receivers, telling how to distinguish them.
__________________
"Everything is impossible until somebody does it - Batman RIP Kevin Conroy, the one true Batman 
|
|
#2
03-29-2012, 11:14 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Isn't the stamped one the one with the ribbed top cover, and the milled one is the one without?
Or is it the other way round?
__________________
You seem nervous... Is it the accent? Do you want to know how I got it? There's only one explanation for everything that's happened to me so far: This universe is trolling me.
|
|
#3
03-30-2012, 12:39 AM
|
||||
|
||||
__________________
 "There's a fine line between not listening and not caring...I like to think I walk that line everyday of my life." Blessed be the LORD, my rock, Who trains my hands for war, And my fingers for battle Psalm 144:1 “It is always wrong to use force, unless it is more wrong not to.”
|
|
#4
03-30-2012, 05:34 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
He's not asking about the receivers guys, he's asking about the dust covers. Milled AKs originally had smooth top covers and stamped AKs had the ribbed ones (I'd imagine they're strengthening ribs since the metal isn't as strong but that's just conjecture on my part). There are exceptions though, but original Russian AKs were configured that way from what I've read.
|
 |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Hybrid Mode
