![]() |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
I think having a page for each frame is a bad idea. It will result in enormous pages of vastly different guns. That being said, adding a notation of the frame type to the Smith & Wesson page is a fantastic idea. One that I am tempted to run with...
|
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
The Model 629 should definitely be split from the 29 page. Not sure why it didn't it's own page to begin with. Model 586/686, 19/66 each have their own.
A category could be created for each frame size, so they can be grouped together that way. Having the frame size listed on the S&W page may help some.
__________________
A man's got to know his limitations. |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
I would agree with the splitting as long as there are proper links from the stainless version to the original.
|
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
Another one that needs some attention is the Model 637 which appears on two different pages. (Smith & Wesson Model 637 & Smith & Wesson Model 37 Airweight / 637 Airweight)
|
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
Did we come to a conclusion on this?
|
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
Noyes. I think the way it's been done with the frame size being listed on the manufacturer page is the best way to go. But other than that I think the original idea is the way to go.
|
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
|
As long as we're consistent, I don't care. I would rather merge than separate stainless from blued versions, but I'll defer to majority opinion on this.
__________________
Cry "Havoc," and let slip the hogs of war. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|