Modern Warfare 2 looks awesome.

[Spartan198]

Originally Posted by k9870

Why not have the russians carrying makaarovs or tokarevs instead of m9s and 1911s? Or that new 9x19m pistol there starting to issue? Ak-74s instead of 47s?

I'd love that, too.

Weapons common amongst shooters, like the cz75/85 and cz-97s, Sig p220/26/29. Walther p99s? A LWRC IAR? would be cool as a automatic rifle.

Yeah, those would be good, especially the SIGs, P99s, and the IAR.

[k9870]

I hope the brazil militia are realistic. Like, if i see them all decked out in tacticool, ill flip. They should have some good guns, but also be a little ratag, with bolt action rifles and stoer shotguns, and mostly taurus handguns, pt92s and wheelguns. If i see them all with benelli m1014s and BEretta 92s i may scream.

Also, two thins that have never been fixed, ever.

Psitols should be portrayed as close range and hard to use, not something that goes exacly on taret with each shot and hits 100 yards away.

And, i ahve never seen this.......A REAL SIGHT PICTURE.
We all know you cnat see rear, front sights and target equally clear. A little blurred vision would help realism. Giving weapons ability to jam wold also be cool. Not like far cry though, there system made no sense. Have it like, you jump in mud with the m4 and it starts jammin, not the system based on total usage where the whole gun goes form prisitine to rust in like 4 mags

[AdAstra2009]

I'm not liking the look of Modernwarfare II, it just looks like Rainbow six Vegas II but with a different name.

[Excalibur]

Not really, the graphics are just like COD4, almost exactly like it. It's like an expansion than a whole new game. Vegas 2 had the same color tones and lighting as the first one.

Now, if Modern Warfare 2 had a 3rd person cover system, the capability to switch firing modes, and squad based combat and takes places in Vegas, THEN you can call it Rainbow Six Vegas 2

[Gunmaster45]

They should have firing mode options for guns anyway Rainbow Six or not. I like firing guns on semi-auto, it saves ammo.

[MT2008]

Originally Posted by Gunmaster45

They should have firing mode options for guns anyway Rainbow Six or not. I like firing guns on semi-auto, it saves ammo.

Well, yeah, but in games, most guns fire slowly enough on full-auto that tapping the trigger quickly to achieve semi-auto fire is easy, unlike real life.

Not to mention that ammo also tends to be much more plentiful in games than it would be in real life. And in games like CS, the game rounds are so short that it's unlikely you'll use up all your ammo before the end anyway.

[Gunmaster45]

But still that's more control to worry about when shooting at another player or AI. I prefer knowing that each time I press down the trigger fully I'll fire only one shot.

And maybe it is just because in RS:V all the guns run empty fast on full auto, but I find I still have a loaded primary gun by the end if I shoot in semi-auto.

[k9870]

Im also hoping weapon daage is more realistic, the "Its a sniper rifle it must be powerful" logic kills me. A .308 m40a1 drops people in one shot but a FAL needs a 6 round burst?

[Gunmaster45]

If I ever make a video game I'll remember your requests.

[k9870]

As long as they don't make it so semi auto mode is more powerful than full auto. You know, like when you turn a FAMAS to semi and it suddenly sounds twice as loud and takes less shots to kill like in rainbow six.


I want jammable guns. I even remember a part of Vegas2 when terrorists were coplaining about how much their guns keep jamming. I kill them, take there guns, and of course, they work perfectly.