That's the point. First he leads us to believe he is some kind of crusader, and then it boils down to him being a bank robber
No, that's not the point. The point, as I explained, is that it's deliberately vague. We really don't know for sure what his motives were. There are too many gray areas, and that's deliberate. That's even what Boll says in the commentary.
06-25-2010, 01:02 AM
Threaded Mode