|
|
|
|
#1
06-21-2010, 01:43 AM
|
||||
|
||||
About the US military not being issued full auto rifles. Then who does get issued M4A1s in full auto. Some of the Marines I know all were issued them.
__________________
 "There's a fine line between not listening and not caring...I like to think I walk that line everyday of my life." Blessed be the LORD, my rock, Who trains my hands for war, And my fingers for battle Psalm 144:1 “It is always wrong to use force, unless it is more wrong not to.” 
|
|
#2
06-21-2010, 05:25 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Ive known several people in army and marines. They wer eissued m16s or m4s depending on their job. All the m4s were full auto capable, but mostly fired in single. Ive never heard of burst fire pre a1 m4 being issued, ever. I think that was more a testing model or something.
|
|
#3
06-21-2010, 05:47 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
That's what I was thinking. The M16s that the Marines I knew were of course the A2s because they didn't get the A4s under after they shipped back home. They all had M4s and they were all full auto capable, but of course trained to fire semi auto.
__________________
"There's a fine line between not listening and not caring...I like to think I walk that line everyday of my life." Blessed be the LORD, my rock, Who trains my hands for war, And my fingers for battle Psalm 144:1 “It is always wrong to use force, unless it is more wrong not to.”
|
|
#4
06-21-2010, 08:28 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
U.S. military doctrine continues to frown upon full-auto for general use by infantry.
|
 |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Hybrid Mode
