![]() |
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
Maybe I'm wrong about this (Steve can correct me), but don't 1911s need the ejection port widened because of the fact that blanks have extended brass heads to hold the extra powder? I imagine that this would present problems in an un-modified 1911 because it would have trouble fitting properly through the ejection port while the gun was cycling. Or, at least, there would be a higher risk of a stovepipe malf.
|
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
So thats why all the old movies have nothing but p-38s and now adays its the taurus/beretta 92s dominating the screen.
|
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
Well, yes, I've been told by several armorers that the Beretta/Taurus 92 is one of the most reliable blank guns, and one of the easiest to convert.
|
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
|
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
The crimp does not hold extra powder the way loads are set now. That would be on extra hot round and it would cause issues over time. All the crimp is for is to assist feeding of the blank rounds. The closer the black is shaped like the original cartridge the better the weapon functions.
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|