|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Composite Pistol in "In the Line of Fire"
Does anyone know exactly why it had to be destroyed after filming?
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
Legal issues, apparently.
__________________
You seem nervous... Is it the accent? Do you want to know how I got it? There's only one explanation for everything that's happened to me so far: This universe is trolling me. |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
What those legal issues were, is what 2wingo's question is. And one I kind of share.
__________________
"Everything is impossible until somebody does it - Batman RIP Kevin Conroy, the one true Batman |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
I imagine there are two parts to this. Firstly there is the "Undetectable Firearms Act of 1988" which would make possession of the pistol illegal in the US (building such a pistol is illegal as well, I'm assuming the production either got a special exemption or it was exempt due to it being for theatrical usage). Secondly the gun was sold as a movie prop (I believe the picture is from the auction listing) rather than as a functional firearm (which would have been much more legally complicated) so it had to be deactivated first. When the pistol was sold I believe it had velcro pads so that it could be stuck back together in the shape of the original gun.
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Oh, I'd never considered before that the thing actually worked, I just thought it was a full scale plastic model of a gun designed by a five year old.
I suppose making it fire blanks was the easiest option, seeing that the movie predated Adobe Muzzle Flash PRO. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
It expired in 1998 but was re-authorized in 2003 and is set to expire this december (2013). With the advent of 3-D printing, you KNOW, some idiot politician is going to make a law banning the mythological all plastic gun again.....
__________________
The trouble is, one requires a specific thing to understand Liam, that thing being "serious head injuries." (Evil Tim 09-09-2011) |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
|
|
|