Quote:
Originally Posted by Evil Tim
On the other hand, though, people want to use cool guns with the right names (or at least what they think are the right names), which means the manufacturers have something the game designers want. Since a lot of the weapons aren't anything you'd market to civilians (especially if you're HK and too busy hating them), the money arrow ends up going in the other direction.
Edit: also he's confusing detail with realism. Game depictions of firearms are usually not realistic, just detailled. Educating yourself to operate a firearm in CoD is fine and good until you go out with an empty magazine and the safety on.
|
It's certainly not required though. For years, shooter games were fine with phony names (I loved the RC-P90), and even
Black Ops 2 gone back to making stuff up (PDW-57, B23R), and I don't think sales have suffered.
LeBron James and Tiger Woods don't pay Nike to wear Nike gear, it's the other way around, and you can argue the same should apply to CoD and Battlefield.