Quote:
Originally Posted by predator20
Lack of respect comes to mind. Maybe the user wanted to be the sole contributor of pics to the page. Why not contact the user and show a comparison of the pics? Ask them why they chose to replace it.
Rockwolf, I'll see what I can do about adding Doomsday to my rental list and get some better caps for you to upload.
|
FYI I already capped Doomsday, and they're in a folder ready to go, but I've been too busy to upload them. [edit] I just wrote that so you would NOT have to spend $$ to rent it just for screencaps.
I figured since no new screencaps had been put in since JULY it was kosher to give it a shot. Hey, I've BOUGHT movies where I waited too long and someone else eventually uploaded the screenshots. I'm cool with it as long as the screen shots don't suck.
But I'm kinda stuck in that I have to be politically sensitive because members get pissed when you replace their crap screenshots will high quality ones.
And of course, the aforementioned original question, why do people REMOVE high quality screenshots and replace them with lower quality ones, just because they weren't the ones to upload it.
Is it a valid arguement to say that high quality screencaps bring down the look of a page if the other screencaps aren't as good? It may be just an ego thing, but I don't understand it.