Forum: Guns & Movies
12-02-2008, 03:25 AM
|
|
Replies: 17
Views: 25,061
|
|
Forum: Guns & Movies
12-02-2008, 03:06 AM
|
|
Replies: 17
Views: 25,061
|
|
Forum: Guns & Movies
12-02-2008, 02:37 AM
|
|
Replies: 17
Views: 25,061
They didn't? I've seen a picture of one of the...
They didn't? I've seen a picture of one of the very earliest PT92s, and it looked just like the original 92 (not the 92F, though). However, I guess it's harder to think of the PT92 as an exact 92...
|
|
Forum: Guns & Movies
12-02-2008, 01:08 AM
|
|
Replies: 17
Views: 25,061
|
|
Forum: Guns & Movies
12-02-2008, 01:07 AM
|
|
Replies: 17
Views: 25,061
Fair enough. But do you think the PT92 page...
Fair enough. But do you think the PT92 page should be on the Beretta 92 page? Again, I just want to be sure that whatever we do, we're consistent.
YES. I'm always embarrassed by that page...
|
|
Forum: Guns & Movies
11-29-2008, 10:09 PM
|
|
Replies: 17
Views: 25,061
Good question. I would have to say no, just...
Good question. I would have to say no, just because Smiths have been around for so long and there have been so many models with various changes to each, that it wouldn't work as well.
Though I...
|
