imfdb.org

imfdb.org (http://forum.imfdb.org/index.php)
-   Just Guns (http://forum.imfdb.org/forumdisplay.php?f=4)
-   -   Springfield Armory Lighweight Champion Operator vs Springfield Armory Operator (http://forum.imfdb.org/showthread.php?t=1562)

sillybunz13 01-14-2011 03:41 PM

Springfield Armory Lighweight Champion Operator vs Springfield Armory Operator
 
Getting a new handgun? Don't know which one to get. I hear that the aluminum frame on the Lightweight Champion Operator has problems? Need some input.

k9870 01-14-2011 03:55 PM

Both have lightweight aluminum frames,heard both are solidly built though. The MC operator has a steel frame. Its a bit more expensive but looks Badass. The Champion is a 4'' bushinless bull barrel, which should be a better carry gun. The regular operator is 5 inch, dont know if it is a traditional or bull barrel.

predator20 01-14-2011 03:59 PM

Do you want the 4" Champion or the 5" Operator? If it's just going to be a range gun, I guess go with 5". With a 4" but with the rail I'm not sure about cc with that, but it could be done. I want to check out the EMP.

k9870 01-14-2011 04:04 PM

Springfield's rail doesn't actually protrude bad. Very well desighned.

sillybunz13 01-14-2011 04:49 PM

I don't care about weight. It's the reliability I'm worried about, and hollow point feeding. And I also meant the MC operator vs Lightweight Champion Operator. I would like the lightweight because it's shorter. But the MC operator is more badass looking and made of pure steel.

k9870 01-14-2011 04:58 PM

Id get the MC for joy of shooting and being way more badass. The Lightweight Champion is a carry, not range, gun. Springfield makes all steel champion loaded models if you like that. There both reliable.


All times are GMT. The time now is 05:57 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.