imfdb.org - Concealed hammer/Striker-fired vs. the traditional exposed hammer

Page 3 of 3

imfdb.org (http://forum.imfdb.org/index.php)

- Just Guns (http://forum.imfdb.org/forumdisplay.php?f=4)

- - Concealed hammer/Striker-fired vs. the traditional exposed hammer (http://forum.imfdb.org/showthread.php?t=1852)

k9870

09-06-2011 07:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by FIVETWOSEVEN (Post 32152)

Striker fired guns have less lock time than one with a hammer, one less thing to snag on, and they are more simple.

And almost none of them have as nice of a trigger pull.

All times are GMT. The time now is 03:14 AM.

Page 3 of 3