imfdb.org

imfdb.org (http://forum.imfdb.org/index.php)
-   imfdb (http://forum.imfdb.org/forumdisplay.php?f=5)
-   -   Specifications section (http://forum.imfdb.org/showthread.php?t=1296)

AdAstra2009 09-30-2010 07:06 PM

Specifications section
 
Is there going to be some kind of standard for specifications on firearms pages?

The one on most pages are like this

http://www.imfdb.org/index.php/M16_r...Specifications

http://www.imfdb.org/index.php/AK-47#Specifications

However SB2296 has started changing the Specifications to be like this

http://www.imfdb.org/index.php/Galil#Specifications

The problem I have with SB 2296's format is that it gives too much information as if this website is an encyclopedia and sort of gives me a headache when I look at it. It takes up too much space as oppose to the original format ,which is sort of a snapshot or general idea of the specifications.

MT2008 09-30-2010 07:13 PM

Personally, I don't like the way it's done on the Galil page. Seems too distracting, and too intrusive.

AdAstra2009 09-30-2010 07:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MT2008 (Post 20157)
Personally, I don't like the way it's done on the Galil page. Seems too distracting, and too intrusive.

Exactly my point, The standard should be how it is (currently) on the M16/AK-47 page.

AdAstra2009 10-01-2010 02:00 AM

Any objections to me changing the Galil specifications back to the original specifications format?

predator20 10-01-2010 02:15 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AdAstra2009 (Post 20297)
Any objections to me changing the Galil specifications back to the original specifications format?

I would tell SB2296 before doing it.

Rockwolf66 10-01-2010 02:38 AM

basically tell him that we all say no to that format and let him know that he should ask on the forum first before such a major change.

BlackIce_GTS 10-01-2010 11:02 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AdAstra2009 (Post 20297)
Any objections to me changing the Galil specifications back to the original specifications format?

FWIW (not a lot), I like SB2296's way better. It's a clear way to spell out the specifications of all the variants. It's not necessary for guns that don't have so many variations, but for something like the G3, FAL, or AR-15, I think it's definitely helpful for understanding/identification.

AdAstra2009 10-01-2010 05:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BlackIce_GTS (Post 20324)
FWIW (not a lot), I like SB2296's way better. It's a clear way to spell out the specifications of all the variants. It's not necessary for guns that don't have so many variations, but for something like the G3, FAL, or AR-15, I think it's definitely helpful for understanding/identification.

This website is not a gun encyclopedia, the point of specifications section is to be a brief snapshot of the weapon's characteristics. Also like others have said SB2296's format is too intrusive/distracting....and might I add unnecessary.

MT2008 10-01-2010 05:53 PM

I would change it, AdAstra, though I guess talking first is a good idea.

And yes, this is not a gun encyclopedia. For us, the only information that matters is the VISUAL information, because that's what allows us to identify those weapons in a movie or TV show. Anything else is probably not relevant.

AdAstra2009 10-01-2010 09:34 PM

I notified him on his talk page yesterday and has yet to respond.


All times are GMT. The time now is 05:03 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.