imfdb.org
Page 2 of 3 1 2 3
Show 40 post(s) from this thread on one page

imfdb.org (http://forum.imfdb.org/index.php)
-   imfdb (http://forum.imfdb.org/forumdisplay.php?f=5)
-   -   I should have listened to GunMaster45.......:( (http://forum.imfdb.org/showthread.php?t=1594)

ManiacallyChallenged 02-03-2011 09:29 AM
Hot damn the P-80 somethings were blocky and awful.

The SR 9 is cool though, heard mixed things about it, but it's cheap and it's a Ruger. Not a fan of mag disconnect.
.
.
.
Frikkin' hate cappuccinos.

S&Wshooter 02-03-2011 05:20 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by MoviePropMaster2008 (Post 25100)
I think a lot of the shooting community's disdain for Ruger semi autos spills over into the non-shooting community. Ruger makes SUPERMAN like revolvers. But the shooting community never liked Ruger's semiautos. Seriously I LIKE their new gun lines. Don't know if you have ever shot their older pistols (P85, P89, P94, etc.) but they are NOT COMFORTABLE to shoot and the ergonomics of the slide release, mag release, etc. are completely ALIEN to human hands.......
And there is the fact that some of them tend to fall apart and/or fire bursts of 2+ at random

k9870 02-03-2011 09:17 PM
Your isolated case of the full auto p90 is not common and rugers are built like tanks, not prone to falling apart.

S&Wshooter 02-03-2011 09:59 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by k9870 (Post 25140)
Your isolated case of the full auto p90 is not common and rugers are built like tanks, not prone to falling apart.
I've heard many, many tales of them falling apart

k9870 02-03-2011 11:07 PM
And I know many, many happy ruger owners. My friend had a dog named ruger.

ersoz 02-03-2011 11:54 PM
I hope you don't mind.
Does this watermark look OK? (Watermark opacity at 20%)

http://i2.photobucket.com/albums/y45.../watermark.jpg

k9870 02-04-2011 12:39 AM
I like the corner one, covering gun just looks bad.

ManiacallyChallenged 02-04-2011 09:51 AM
The corner is a mediocre deterrent at best, but watermarks over the image I do not go for. It's a slippery slope, very hard call to make, etc.
At the end of the day, the pictures look much better and less distracting without the watermark. No watermark may not be a tenable solution however.

Up to you MPM, this stuff is your baby.

ersoz 02-04-2011 10:01 PM
You're right. Watermark over the picture doesn't look good.

Here's another option. This one would require some work but I'm pretty sure it would be deterrent.

http://i2.photobucket.com/albums/y45...watermark2.jpg

BurtReynoldsMoustache 02-04-2011 10:07 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by ersoz (Post 25193)
You're right. Watermark over the picture doesn't look good.

Here's another option. This one would require some work but I'm pretty sure it would be deterrent.

http://i2.photobucket.com/albums/y45...watermark2.jpg
Needs more gradation. You can circumvent this in MS Paint by setting the erase tool to erase the one color of the watermark. You can also use the instant alpha function in Preview for Mac. It would be a tad time consuming, though very simple.


All times are GMT. The time now is 11:31 AM.
Page 2 of 3 1 2 3
Show 40 post(s) from this thread on one page

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.