Fair enough, but media fairness/bias is as abundant in coverage as those who are covering the story allow it to be, and they're at least illustrating that they can be fair in some respect. It may be part of the "2 percent", but it's something, and it's part of a really significant paper in a really anti gun state at that. Credit where credit is due for the LA Times, even if it's brief.

300 editors doesn't sound like errbody. :p

The thing that everyone is missing here is that this isn't a pro-gun/anti-gun Democrat/Republican article. Chris worked very hard to make sure that Rebecca understood that the site is about PROPS. We DO NOT have an agenda when it comes to the gun debate. Obviously our users have their own opinions but the site is a PROP database.

Thanks Zack, I think that's the right sentiment. I wanted to make sure we were viewed from an entertainment angle, we cover a very specific aspect of film and The Industry.

Anyways, here's the spread for those of you not in LA (almost everyone :p)

http://www.imfdb.org/images/5/54/LATimesCoverCrop.jpg

300 editors does sound like everybody...that matters :p

211 users who have made edits within the past thirty days.

Does this mean our site has to look more "professional" because we're getting more media coverage?

I wish after so many years, our site would be teaming up with more prop gun guys telling us directly what guns is really in what movie.

The guys that spoke so well of us in that article are the biggest in the business, I fully expect a lot more direct cooperation moving forward.

Wow. Guess this means we're going to see our traffic increase dramatically. Good for imfdb though. Way to go bunni.

I guess that this means I have to clean up the Army of Two page that i made and get someone who can pull screencaps out of an X-box 360 andwho's willing to spend the time to buy all the weapons and Upgrades to replace the Images i made with a camera on a tripod in front of a TV screen.