Caps added to "Street Fighter"
 

I'm not quite finished capping it yet, but I've added quite a few pics to the article.

http://www.imfdb.org/index.php/Street_Fighter

What do you guys think so far? And be honest. I can take it. :)

The images look good and you appeared to indentify the weapons properly, BUT... you didn't follow proper format. Put the gun image above the screencaps, not below it. Link the gun being used to the gun page. Put all of the images in "thumb" windows, not just some. And please, I beg of you, don't refer to the gun as a "Beretta M92F"! It is a Beretta 92F or a Beretta 92FS (and Van-Dammes' is the stainless Beretta 92FS Inox). This is mentioned on the Beretta page. And I don't know if missiles fall under the category of firearms. We mainly cover small arms on IMFDb, and at the most large auto cannons or artillery pieces. If you need any help we'll all be here to help fix the format.

Keep up the good work, before you know it all this will be instinct. ;)

I lol'ed at the Type 56 being "one of the most advanced weaponry of the world"

Ok I think I fixed everything except for the fact that it is a really crappy movie.

"A chromed Beretta 92FS"

(???) It's an Inox. And the images are still under the screencaps and the gun pages aren't linked to. So two out of three are still off. ;)

I didn't put that. When I took the cap for it, I named it "Beretta 92FS Inox". ;)

In my opinion, it's a fucking mess. You screencapped, yes, but that is all you did. You have to put captions on the images and put links to the gun pages. Another advice, is to post weapons you don't what they are in the talk page. Like what i did in the We Were Soldiers talk page. Do that, and the page would be complete.

Hmm...I could have sworn I did caption the images. :confused:

Okay, I'll get to fixing it in the next couple of days. I still need to finish capping the movie, too.