We wouldn't have to have these drug policies if we publicly killed drug traffickers and broadcast it live on every channel

The Flintstones debuted fifty years ago today. How long ago was that? Long ago where something like this was acceptable:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bSeXEl_rl_s

Banning cocaine has nothing to do with being allowed an asprin. Its probably a liability thing, like said, like a school getting in trouble for giving a medicine somebodys allergic too.

Why do you think trafficking drugs is worthy of execution? Bangladesh, Egypt, India, Indonesia, Iran, Iraq, Kuwait, Laos, Malaysia, North Korea, Oman, Saudi Arabia, Sri Lanka, United Arab Emirates, Zimbabwe. These are the countries that execute people for selling drugs. They still have drug problems in these countries, the laws don't work there either. Are you telling me you want to live in a country like Indonesia?

If I were able to get back inside after walking out to the parking lot, I would've just took one of the excedrine my dad left in the Expedition

That's also a liability issue.

Zero tolerance policies prohibit you from having any drugs anywhere on school property. So no, even if you could go back out to the parking lot, you'd still get in trouble. Your dad might even get in trouble for what they may phrase as "enabling delinquent behavior".

Can we stop arguing about fucking drugs? BurtReynoldsMustache started this whole goddamn arguement. Anyway, I love this image:


http://www.thecontrarianmedia.com/wp...smLebowski.jpg

Anybody doing anything for Halloween? I'm going to sit one my lawn with a BB gun, a boombox blaring Judas Priest, and a big ass bowl of candy

Why the BB gun?