imfdb.org

imfdb.org (http://forum.imfdb.org/index.php)
-   Just Guns (http://forum.imfdb.org/forumdisplay.php?f=4)
-   -   Frag-12 HE shotgun shell (http://forum.imfdb.org/showthread.php?t=340)

AdAstra2009 06-25-2009 03:27 AM

Frag-12 HE shotgun shell
 
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PAdzwODyafg

man that is so nice, just think about it -you could load your typical shotgun with this and they'd have no idea you were basically packing a pump action grenade launcher.

Gunmaster45 06-25-2009 05:55 AM

The ones being fired looked like they had some sting to them but I want to see them fire the more powerful rounds that make a REAL grenade explosion.

Rockwolf66 06-25-2009 06:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AdAstra2009 (Post 4175)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PAdzwODyafg

man that is so nice, just think about it -you could load your typical shotgun with this and they'd have no idea you were basically packing a pump action grenade launcher.

Yeah you carry your shotgun and I'll borrow the EX-41 prototype. then we can see the differance between a shotgun fireing explosive slugs and a real grenade launcher.

AdAstra2009 06-25-2009 06:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rockwolf66 (Post 4183)
Yeah you carry your shotgun and I'll borrow the EX-41 prototype. then we can see the differance between a shotgun fireing explosive slugs and a real grenade launcher.

It's not so much the weapon that intrigues me but that you can load these explosive slugs into a shotgun just like any other shell.

zzang1847 09-11-2009 05:07 AM

Compare both of it
 
Deleteddeleteddeleted

Nyles 09-11-2009 05:39 AM

Come on guys, the EX-41 was a prototype from the 60s. They abandoned stand-alone grenade launchers like that for a reason - soldiers have to carry enough kit without adding a whole second longarm to the mix.

I know the USMC has bought the M32, and that's ok for mounted troops, but I'd hate to see light infantry saddled with them.

Rockwolf66 09-11-2009 07:08 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Nyles (Post 6848)
Come on guys, the EX-41 was a prototype from the 60s. They abandoned stand-alone grenade launchers like that for a reason - soldiers have to carry enough kit without adding a whole second longarm to the mix.

I know the USMC has bought the M32, and that's ok for mounted troops, but I'd hate to see light infantry saddled with them.

Nyles,
I hate to nitpic but the China Lake Launcher was the experimental pump-action Grenade launcher from the 1960's. The EX-41 was a high velocity pump action weapon from the mid 1990's. Some idiot mixed up the nomenclature and now you have alot of people calling the weapons by the wrong names.

I know I'm useing Wikipedia but I hace confirmed most of the info from various sources.

China Lake Grenade Launcher

EX-41 Grenade Launcher

Excalibur 09-11-2009 04:12 PM

Nah, I wouldn't take the EX-41. I prefer the M32. 6 rounds of semi auto grenade fire.

Rockwolf66 09-11-2009 08:11 PM

There was one big advantage to the EX-41 that I know of. I had a friend of mine ask Kevin Dockerty about the system and I got some interesting information. Ever see a shoulder fired grenade launcher hit a target out to 1,200m accuratly. Standalone systems should be used to suplement more conventionally armed forces. Sort of like keeping an M79 in the turret of a Humvee on point to disable suspected IEDs. The M32 is a supression weapon great for driving opponants out from cover and into direct fire. the EX-41 could be concidered a "pocket mortar" due to it's large effective range.


All times are GMT. The time now is 09:03 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.