Gun-related videos and channels take a serious hit on youtube
In the middle of the advertising boycott on youtube, it seems that the Google-owned website has chosen to jettison gun-related content as "advertiser-unfriendly."
A wide variety of gun-related content producers on youtube, even the channel made for the Firearm Blog website, have all had their entire video library classified as "restricted" and thus demonetized entirely. Could this be the start of a trend? Could this wiki be next? What's going on here? :confused: |
I am surprised this hasn't happened sooner, but damn, that's a LOT of channels that's lost money over this, big and small. It's the small ones that are more in trouble because those guys do this full time and don't have actual jobs to support them.
This is life ending for a lot of small timers. |
So far the videos that I have viewed and enjoy are still on youtube. Especially Hickock 45. Crossing my fingers.
|
Quote:
|
The new problem is that a LOT of these channels are trying to, but not saying that they are, relying on fans on Patreon. That's a good idea, but let's say I have 12 favorite gun channels, and I actually watch a lot more. Lost count on how many channels. I can only donate so much of my money every month and I got other channels I like that aren't gun related, that I want to support. People will start deciding on not donating or stop donating after so long before they realized how much money is being spent a month.
|
Does anybody know if it is possible for content creators to appeal the demonetisation in this case? It used to be appealable, then I heard recently that it wasn't any more, but then Youtube claimed that the lack of an appeals process was a "bug" that they were fixing. This was about 2 weeks ago now, so am just curious if anybody is aware of a gun channel that has successfully appealed the age restriction/demonetisation.
|
From what I've been looking up, this is a recent problem that's on top of YouTube getting boycotted by a bunch of companies pulling their ads, so this had lead to newer stupid policies on other channels as well, like a view limit before you can get money on a video.
|
I think that the 10,000 views before monetisation is actually a good policy. If you are legitimately making content of your own, 10,000 global views (ever for all videos, not just for one video) is really not that much, and the amount of money you would get before this point is pretty negligible to by honest. I'm not sure exactly what the figure is, but I believe that Youtube pays something like $8 per 1000 ad views, with an ad view only counting if you don't skip in the first 30 seconds or something. Lets say that only about 30% of people actually watch the ad to this point, that means that the ad revenue that you are missing out on is only like $25 in total. The purpose of this 10,000 views before monetisation is to stop people creating spam accounts with misleading video titles, channels that rip other peoples content, or channels that claim copyright of other peoples content to steal the monetisation.
|
FWIW there is another video site called Full30 that isn't controlled by Google and all the other gun hating Internet folks.....at least not yet. Hickock45 and others are on it as well. I just joined.
https://www.full30.com/ |
Same here, but Full30 for the moment is sort of a like the country club for gun channels. You need to have of some reputation, it seems and be invited to the site. You can't just make up a channel and start posting vids like YouTube. At least, not yet.
|
True, but it's a start and it's free of a gun hating administration. Remember it took several years for YouTube to reach it's current level.
|
Things get worse for Youtube gun channels
Aside from a youtube pro-gun personality like James Yeager being banned, now the post-Parkland shooting media frenzy has fanned anti-gunners to a fever pitch so much that a major gun-focussed youtuber named Military Arms Channel shut down his channel briefly in protest.
Apparently Google also tried to censor everything with the word gun, or rifle, or revolver, etc. for their shopping results. This was quickly reversed, but ended up censoring (by returning no results) the results for terms like "burgundy," "trifle," and the "Sex Pistols." |
This is getting out of control with the level of censorship and misinformation being thrown out.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Goes without saying I'm way beyond tired of this shit. And I'd say it's already gotten well out of control myself. |
This is a good playlist to listen to in the background if you want to discover what an insane dystopia the inside of Google is:
https://www.youtube.com/playlist?lis...OFTZCZjqa5pss3 I mean seriously, some of this stuff is literally straight out of Nineteen Eighty-Four and / or Brave New World. |
With the stirring of gun bans and draconian gun laws coming up, I'm stocking up on ammo and parts.
|
Quote:
|
Every time I watch the news, it worries me how little these people think of our rights and how little gun laws work.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
You can see a video posted by Hickok45, a long-running gun youtuber talking about the situation here. One of the best comments in that video is from the Magnum Channel: "I got a strike for a magazine loading video because they said it promoted illegal activity! Lol 😂" |
Honestly, every paycheck, I always buy more ammo to stock up regardless of the times. I got a few thousand rounds of every caliber by now.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Ok, I need to be specific. I meant every caliber for every gun I OWN...and maybe a couple wild ones. I own a box of .50 BMG but I don't have a gun for it.
And I'm not paying 50 bucks a pop for a single tround for the Dardick |
pls send .32 S&W Long they want more for it than .357 here
|
Quote:
But now hear this. The following is Google's relatively new anti-gun policy for Youtube videos from Mar. 21, 2018 onwards: Quote:
Will this include historical documentaries or even films that show how historical firearms are put together too? How safe is the IMFDB wiki from this new wave of censorship? |
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Meanwhile, we have The Firearm Blog trying to see what will keep a firearms-related video from being demonetized on Youtube.
|
And we have a deranged Persian lady trying to shoot them.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
What I do know is that none of the major media have made any big articles or reports on this. There literally is nothing on my Facebook feed about this at all. This isn't a random shooting at some no name business. It's the headquarters of fucking YouTube. Where's the CNN bullshit about this?
|
https://www.cnn.com/2018/04/04/us/yo...ing/index.html
https://www.cnn.com/2018/04/05/us/yo...ing/index.html https://www.cnn.com/2018/04/03/us/yo...ing/index.html https://www.cnn.com/2018/04/04/opini...ion/index.html I think the biggest difference here is that no one but the gunman died. The fewer the deaths, the smaller the story. |
I'm surprised no one claiming she's an linked to any terrorist groups. Plus, she used a pistol, not an evil mass-murdering AR-15 "assault weapon."
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 09:46 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.