Righto, cap'n Silver. Arrrrr.

Didn't know he was a porno actor, didja?

Congrats MPM, you've started a discussion about porn on two threads so far. Wanna go for more? ;)

Oh, my bad, I mean LONGDONG...

I have learned that every mounted gun is a Browning masquerading as a DSHK.

Alright Vangelis' Dong, I'm just going to forget everything I thought I knew about the two of you, and start over.

Hey John,
MPM has yet to start "The N.O.D. Thread" so please don't tempt him.

Oh come on, I didn't mean that and you know it. :D

Most are based on real weapons, just badly done. Can't it just be locked to stop the stupid people that won't leave it as "Sniper Rifle"?

^^i agree with this^^
get the article to a state that most can agree upon and then lock it
forever

now dongs is insisting the sniper rifle is a WA2000 and the shotgun is a SPAS12, even though he doesn't label them as such.

what is the point buddy? just leave it alone.

No I'm not. I'm pointing out the markings on the sniper rifle's scope and the scope itself are based on the one from Dalton's WA2000 in The Living Daylights, because they are; you have a night vision scope with a large scope tube and a much thinner tube to its right [IR light?]. The markings on the thinner tube are all placed on the thicker one, save the one nearest the muzzle. This is not in any way saying that the rifle itself is a WA2000.

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v4...ff/SnRifle.jpg

The smaller tube is visible in the side view of the sniper rifle, with a black body and a white band at the end. It even projects forward of the scope by the same distance.

The similarities to the SPAS, such as they are, are documented in the article; it is a minor resemblance, but it exists and most of those who've edited the article can see it. Stop vandalising articles and consider actually contributing something rather than just deleting information. You seem to just be here to try to start fights with people over trivial details.

What the hell is an N.O.D. thread.?