imfdb.org

imfdb.org (http://forum.imfdb.org/index.php)
-   Off Topic (http://forum.imfdb.org/forumdisplay.php?f=3)
-   -   Modern Warfare 3 (http://forum.imfdb.org/showthread.php?t=1736)

funkychinaman 05-29-2011 04:27 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mandolin1 (Post 29594)
Isn't that kinda the definition of a PMC?

No. The C in PMC is Contractor, which they're not if they're military.

The clips look like they were fighting in Manhattan. Why not just seal it off and let whoever is there wither on the vine?

S&Wshooter 05-29-2011 04:33 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by funkychinaman (Post 29605)
No. The C in PMC is Contractor, which they're not if they're military.

The clips look like they were fighting in Manhattan. Why not just seal it off and let whoever is there wither on the vine?

Hit it with a nuke *evil grin*

Mandolin1 05-29-2011 09:05 PM

"Nuke the site from orbit. It's the only way to be sure"
Couldn't resist.

S&Wshooter 05-29-2011 09:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mandolin1 (Post 29618)
"Nuke the site from orbit. It's the only way to be sure"
Couldn't resist.

What is that from?

S&Wshooter 05-29-2011 09:21 PM

Oh, it's from Aliens

Evil Tim 05-30-2011 07:46 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mandolin1 (Post 29594)
To me, fighting in New York is the epitome of stupid. To do so is to surrender any artilery, air support, and armor advantage. Artillery and aircraft are useless with the tall buildings and helecopters are vulnerable to anti-tank-rockets and machine guns, since the buildings get in the way and limit manuvability. APCs will be better than tanks, since the autocannon of an APC has a higher elevation than a tank's main gun, and any advantage the tank has in the armor department is negated (again) by anti-tank teams six stories up shooting at the thin top armor.

Well, a tank with an RWS mounting a Mark 19 would be as useful as an IFV (a Brad's chaingun is still limited to 60 degrees elevation while I believe an M151 Protector can shoot straight up if you feel so inclined) and you shouldn't underestimate the usefulness of a tank in urban warfare; while they need infantry support, they don't have the issues missile-based platforms do with things like power lines. Also, recall they have whatever anti-missile system was on Honey Badger that made it think it was a Bradley.

Also, at least it's not the Nazis in Turning Point: Fall of Liberty dropping paratroops on downtown Manhattan while bombing and shelling it with battleships at the same time.

The Wierd It 05-30-2011 10:36 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Evil Tim (Post 29664)
Also, recall they have whatever anti-missile system was on Honey Badger that made it think it was a Bradley.

Honey Badger was a Stryker (More specifically an M1126).

Excalibur 05-30-2011 11:32 AM

Pretty sure when this comes out, I'm going to just rent it and see if it is worth having

Evil Tim 05-30-2011 12:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Wierd It (Post 29665)
Honey Badger was a Stryker (More specifically an M1126).

Yeah, I know. That's kind of the point, they just stuck something like Trophy or Arena on it and deployed it like it was an IFV.

Mandolin1 05-30-2011 07:18 PM

Quote:

Also, at least it's not the Nazis in Turning Point: Fall of Liberty dropping paratroops on downtown Manhattan while bombing and shelling it with battleships at the same time.
Ow, don't remind me. That game was SOOOOOO dumb. Have you seen the Let's Play of it on Youtube? Hilarious.


All times are GMT. The time now is 01:13 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.